• 0 Posts
  • 91 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • Probably. At that point you might as well just copy/paste the existing compiler though. The temperature is basically the thing that makes it seem intelligent, because it gives different responses each time, so it seems like it’s thinking. But yeah, having it just always give the most likely response would probably be better, but also probably wouldn’t play well with copyright laws when you have the exact same code as an existing compiler.


  • You’re still correct. The thing about LLMs is that they’re statistical models that output one of the most likely responses, from the list of most likely responses. It still has some randomness though. You can tune this, but no randomness is shit, and too much randomness sometimes generates stupid garbage. With a large enough output, you’re statistically likely, with any randomness, to generate some garbage. A compiler is sufficiently large and complex that it’s going to end up creating garbage somewhere, even if it’s trained on these compilers specifically.













  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoLGBTQ+@lemmy.blahaj.zoneScience!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think your point is actually “even things that are right and obvious are not always obviously right” or something like that. It’s obvious to all of us that 1+1=2, and it is correct, but it isn’t correct because it’s obvious. It just happens to be both obvious and correct, but for very different reasons.



  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoProgrammer Humor@programming.devIFS=$'\n'
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    The way this should work is it’s set as either left-to-right or right-to-left. (C:)/1/2/3.ext or ext.3/2/1/(:C). It shouldn’t render part of it one direction and part of it the other direction logically. It’s probably impossible to fix at this point, but this makes a lot more sense.