Also, who’s doing the strawmanning here? I said that “phones are useful devices that people rely on, while [smart glasses] are not”. Then, you went on a tirade how I said that smart glasses are “marginally convenient” instead of “literally useless”.
Did I say that they are literally useless? Or rather, implied that they are something along the lines of “marginally convenient”, thus not being “useful devices that people rely on”?
Also, I did not say anything about equivalence. I said “more akin to”. Which you took as literal equivalence.
Removed by mod
If it makes you happy you can think you won the argument
Removed by mod
See my previous comment about strawmanning, mr. “I learned about logical fallacies 5 days ago”
EDIT: So mad you come and check the replies within 5 minutes just to downvote?
Removed by mod
Reply point by point:
Can you read? If yes, read my previous comment.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Well, you never actually addressed the points. But if expecting that is “being a dick”, well, whatever…