OmegaLemmy@discuss.online to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoHow active is Lemmy now?message-squaremessage-square156fedilinkarrow-up1141arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up1128arrow-down1message-squareHow active is Lemmy now?OmegaLemmy@discuss.online to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square156fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBlaze (he/him)@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·5 days agoI don’t post on !movies@lemm.ee that much anymore, it’s usually other posters now. Same for patientgamers, parenting and casualconversation I never post on !foodporn showsandmovies we are now 2. I started posting on !AskUSA@discuss.online recently, now it’s mostly other people too Lemmy has maybe a handful of communities outside of the politics/meta-fediverse topics. That’s already a much different statement than consider yourself lucky if you manage to get 2 other people commenting on it. https://feddit.org/post/6346355 157 comments https://feddit.org/post/5821462 59 comments I don’t understand why you want to exaggerate the situation, while there are clearly other communities than American politics For people reading this: https://lemmyverse.net/communities
minus-squarerglullis@communick.newslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·4 days agoYou want to use the extreme end of the distribution curve and make the argument that it is close to the median case. It is not.
minus-squareBlaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 days agoThere are 44k monthly active users on this platform. According to you, they only talk about American politics. According to me, they also talk about other topics. Another thread I open yesterday, 55 comments: https://sopuli.xyz/post/21023787 I’m providing examples and numbers to back up my claims, you use incorrect hyperboles.
minus-squarerglullis@communick.newslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·4 days agoThe number of discussions about American politics are orders of magnitude higher than discussions about any of “other topics”. This is more than enough to justify the use of hyperbole.
minus-squareBlaze (he/him)@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 days agoNobody is denying that discussions over American politics are very active. Thankfully, those communities can be blocked. On top of that, !asklemmy@lemmy.world added a new rule against US politics questions, so new questions are about anything else. Random post from yesterday, 158 comments https://feddit.org/post/6407464
I don’t post on !movies@lemm.ee that much anymore, it’s usually other posters now. Same for patientgamers, parenting and casualconversation
I never post on !foodporn
showsandmovies we are now 2.
I started posting on !AskUSA@discuss.online recently, now it’s mostly other people too
That’s already a much different statement than
I don’t understand why you want to exaggerate the situation, while there are clearly other communities than American politics
For people reading this: https://lemmyverse.net/communities
You want to use the extreme end of the distribution curve and make the argument that it is close to the median case. It is not.
There are 44k monthly active users on this platform.
According to you, they only talk about American politics.
According to me, they also talk about other topics.
Another thread I open yesterday, 55 comments: https://sopuli.xyz/post/21023787
I’m providing examples and numbers to back up my claims, you use incorrect hyperboles.
The number of discussions about American politics are orders of magnitude higher than discussions about any of “other topics”. This is more than enough to justify the use of hyperbole.
Nobody is denying that discussions over American politics are very active.
Thankfully, those communities can be blocked.
On top of that, !asklemmy@lemmy.world added a new rule against US politics questions, so new questions are about anything else.
Random post from yesterday, 158 comments https://feddit.org/post/6407464