• StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    17 days ago

    This is not an accomplishment, this is stolen technology with more resources applied.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      It’s both.
      Which isn’t a bad thing if you view this as a global society with a global problem to solve.
      In 500 years it won’t matter who gets credit.

      If it does matter to you, you still have 10 years to get it done. So get started.

      • StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        The Chinese already have a propensity for self promotion and thinking you’re better than everyone else is a fallacy. I agree it doesn’t matter who gets it done, just that it gets done and the technology is shared to make life on this planet better. I don’t know details of the Chinese sharing history/policy but if we look at other nations use of knowledge to manipulate and cajole, I don’t have much hope. I sure hope we have 500 years to find out.

      • StoneyPicton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I believe in the concept of IP but not in it’s current practice. My argument is not in this but in someone taking credit for the work of others. Now China may have innovated and contributed most of the breakthroughs that led to this success, but given the record of infiltration into government and private companies around the world I have chosen to look at any “accomplishments” that they claim as being theft. That is their legacy to deal with.