Mods, please feel free to remove if I’m still getting this wrong
It seems the current rule is:
“If they are not public figures/sex workers/clearly consenting in some way DO NOT POST THEM. Unless you can explicitly prove that they are in one of the aforementioned categories, random sorority girls, random groups of girls at the beach, random girls in dresses, etc. are not allowed to be posted. They did not consent to this type of thing.”
So…is the conclusion that depicted women need only be public figures? Because that’s how I would read the “/“ that punctuates those three categories and the fact that the rule explicitly says “in one of the aforementioned categories”.
In which case, these ladies are the Polish national track team (https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKSLQJQIFaO/; https://sport.interia.pl/lekkoatletyka/news-ledwie-memorial-szewinskiej-wystartowal-a-juz-rekord-polski,nId,21823531) and the photo is on a number of public headlines. They are, by my interpretation, public figures by all account given their celebrity status in Europe at the very minimum.
If that is not how the rule is to be read, perhaps the rule is in need of some clarification and rewriting.
You must log in or # to comment.
So your bright idea for having an issue with the format of the rule is to post pics of women who obviously haven’t consented to being the subject of male sexual fantasies so that a bunch of men can comment on about which one they would like to fuck. You don’t think you could bring this up with mods in a way that isn’t gross and misogynistic?
The rule is not ambiguous at all. They must be clearly consenting to have sexualised comments posted about them.
Go go go 5 !!!
1
Number 1
Amen, the rule is ambiguous.
I don’t think it is actually - seems like there’s one plain reading to it. But if the mods feel the need to set standards that don’t comport with the reading, it would benefit everyone for the rule to be appropriately tweaked.
We should just leave Reddit… Oh wait.
Face. Number 4
Body. Number 1Complete package. Tricky, probably 4
Honourable mentions to 7 and 8. Who maybe in a different set of pics would get top marks
1,4,6 in that order… 1 is just soo muscular, she looks incredible
4,5,6 or 7
4
Also, the rule is dumb
4! <3
5th from left
75643182
Well since there’s twice as many girls as before, that means twice as many picks, right? I’ll be sticking with 7 and adding 6.
deleted by creator
