• MotoAsh@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Of course there’s a technical reason for it, but they have incentive to try and sell even a shitty product.

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        How does it not? This isn’t a fucking debate. How would artificially bloating the number of tokens they sell not help their bottom line?

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because they currently lose money for every token sold. They’re operating at a loss to generate a userbase so that they can monetize later. They’re currently in the pre-enshittification (I still don’t like that word) phase where they want to offer a good product at a loss and lure in customers, not phase 2 where they monetize their userbase.

          • MotoAsh@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            and? How do you not understand that more money is better for them even if they’re not in the black, yet?

            Two things can be true at once.

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Creating additional tokens LOSES them money. For a single token, the cost of generating it exceeds the profits.

              I genuinely don’t understand what would drive someone to be this condescending when you don’t even understand the argument I have clearly laid out four times now.

              • MotoAsh@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Do you think they don’t want people using their product? Are you really that dense?

                • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Are you? Because now we’ve agreed on every fact to determine my conclusion is correct. Yes they do want people using their product; they want to lure in customers. Wasting tokens generating unhelpful output would both drive customers away with a worse experience, and cost them more money. So there’s no reason for them to do that. Like I said in my first post.