• goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because it’s treated differently in piefed but still an example of how the software is designed to punish those who do not act the way the creator wants.

    If the part after the but is ignored sure. But that part is also the issue so 🤷.

    The point is the tools of piefed will amply the bad actors by allowing them to do the worst parts of reddit in the fediverse.

    • Blaze@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Piefed system doesn’t punish those who do not act “the way the creator wants”.

      Downvotes given are only actions from the user, no interaction from the Piefed dev.

      Downvotes received is feedback from other users, no interaction from the Piefed dev either.

      allowing them to do the worst parts of reddit in the fediverse.

      Trolls are already around, as you pointed out in another comment. I would rather have a tool that works 80% of the time to detect trolls than no tools at all.

        • Blaze@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          And when you only focus on the edge cases every tool seems insufficient.

          About my confidence: you’re not on Piefed, so you don’t experience the system as a user. If you give it a try, I’m quite sure you’ll see it works as intended 80-90% of the time.

          And again, if a legit user gets flagged as toxic, there’s no other consequence besides the warning, that doesn’t prevent anything from being seen.

          • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            if a legit user gets flagged as toxic, there’s no other consequence besides the warning, that doesn’t prevent anything from being seen.

            Yet