Not to mention that they locked the unpopular pull request from reactions.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Yes, I expect them to stand up for the rights of users. Why don’t you?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        It’s complying in advance, when civil disobedience is called for.

        The problem isn’t the technical change itself; the problem is the motivation and context.

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        The premise for why it’s being added however, subjectively does.

        Which you know.

        Also full address and name aren’t mandatory, so it’s not really a good comparison.

        edit: I just realised i also replied to the same comment from you elsewhere in this thread.

      • logging_strict@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Rights? Why does the question of rights arise when discussing malware?

        wtf! Everyone has an excuse for absolute everything and anything.