• higgsboson@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Or just offers shade, or looks nice.

        Those less tangible things also have value both under law and under capitalism. OP has a 4th grade understanding of economics.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Those are things of value but not commodities and are outside what I was using for examples of capitalism. Though fuckers would absolutely charge you to enjoy those things if they can figure out how to make us ;(

      • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        You say that like national parks and protected lands aren’t strictly anti-capitalist concepts. Ones that capitalists aren’t trying to destroy constantly and currently.