not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Trans Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 days agomany are my many nameslemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up1348arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1341arrow-down1imagemany are my many nameslemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Trans Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square24linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days agoBut so was 27 years ago. As such before 2000 is not equivalent to seeing the fall of the USSR.
minus-square𝓜𝓲𝓪@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-26 days agoSeeing the fall of nations, does not mean seeing the fall of all nations. It is perfectly valid that many of us born before 2000 saw an event in 1993. Why people argued against this is weird.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 days agoI may have read it wrong. I suppose it is ambiguous whether all or merely a subset of people born before 2000 are meant, though the correct statement is obviously more plausible if you weren’t looking at mathematical formulae 30 seconds prior 😅
But so was 27 years ago. As such before 2000 is not equivalent to seeing the fall of the USSR.
Seeing the fall of nations, does not mean seeing the fall of all nations.
It is perfectly valid that many of us born before 2000 saw an event in 1993. Why people argued against this is weird.
I may have read it wrong. I suppose it is ambiguous whether all or merely a subset of people born before 2000 are meant, though the correct statement is obviously more plausible if you weren’t looking at mathematical formulae 30 seconds prior 😅