• Laser@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    It should be noted that these regulations are there to protect the rivers from overheating, the nuclear power plant doesn’t really care that much.

    They’re still a liability though, not only for the reason of heating up rivers

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Ah makes sense, I was really confused why we were protecting a steam turbine from summer heat.

      So instead of turning off they could also run it at 50%? If that’s even a thing.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 days ago

        Europe as in the EU member states don’t mine uranium, so it’s a strategic dependency anyways. If you’re not a nuclear power (i.e. France or the UK, though no longer a Union member), nuclear makes no sense

        • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          True, but a reliable supply exists with your friends in Canada. Nuclear has to be secondary to wind and solar, but in a fossil fuel free world it still has a place.

          • Laser@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            “Surely this time relying on partner nations won’t get us in trouble”

            • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              What is the EU if not partners you count on? It’s not wise to go it alone. Friends and partners are good to have. Also as I stated, nuclear comes after wind and solar.

              • Laser@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                7 days ago

                My point was relying on Canada for Uranium is like relying on the US for, I don’t know, weapons or something, you’re only one election away from being cut off a resource

                • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  I totally get that. But that is really a fact of life. No country can afford to live on only its own resources.

                  Edit: Canada has always wanted to sell its resources and is not aspiring empire. So one election away isn’t accurate. Both major parties will gladly sell. It is vital to us, and makes us just that more reliable a partner.