EDIT: We have at least one user claiming that EAC and BattlEye can NOT see what programs are running on your computer via proton on Linux.
EDIT 2: According to brucethemoose@lemmy.world with comment https://lemmy.world/comment/24738141
"Yes and no.
If you run task manager or something in Proton? It just shows Proton processes:
ImagePlaceholderBut all linux process, and tons of information about them, are readable in the /proc directory. They’re just files, accessible to the program.
Try
ls /procyourself.There’s nothing stopping anti cheat from checking that, if it’s configured to do it.
Which is pretty dang convincing to me.
If I have a good understanding, the Symlinks that Proton uses allow the games to view nearly your entire drive and see what software is running? Because Proton is explicitly NOT a virtual machine and merely a translation layer for Windows applications to run on Linux?
The reason I like to ask is because this is the general consensus, that Proton applications are not secure, but when searching online it doesn’t explicitly state anywhere if the games with EAC or BattlEye are capable of spying on Linux users. So I’m looking for confirmation on this.


Rude. Based on your post I see that you are either misinformed or missing important information. I was trying my best to help you with my years of experience with Linux and privacy and now that you are going this way about this I am not very keen to do so.
Having root privileges and access to your system files (anything below the / directory, it is the root of your filesystem) are different things. Even without root privileges important information can be gathered about your system (e.g. by reading your
/etcfolder).That’s insulting.
Correct. The difference is that they are not asking for root privileges on Linux.
I’m glad I checked with you about the LLM thing because I felt pretty slighted when I thought I was putting forth effort for a conversation and suspected others weren’t at all participating but instead routing in their bots. I feel better knowing you’re genuine.
I’m not, why would you accuse someone of being an LLM if you lack the understanding on the topic to make that judgement. The comment you accused of being from an llm was pretty clear, I’m not every sure what you were responding to making that accusation. It must that the accusation was an emotional one because you made the mistake of “feeling slighted” over a totally mundane explanation you asked for.
Frankly your posts in reply to most of these comments looks both stilted and robotic with an overall lack of understanding of the material you are replying to. IMO that looks like an LLM someone has sent to collect information and provide the consensus back to the user?
Are you sure you shouldn’t disclose anything?