Because let’s say you’re Tom Hanks. And you get TomHanks@Lemmy.World

Well, what’s stopping someone else from adopting TomHanks@Lemm.ee?

And some platforms minimize the text size of platform, or hide it entirely. So you just might see TomHanks, and think it’s him. But it’s actually a 7 year old Chinese boy with a broken leg in Arizona.

Because anyone can grab the same name, on a different platform.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    With the celebrities come their followers. Which is like 97% of the world. I’m trying to get that 97% to adopt the fediverse.

    But they don’t come on their own. They go where their celebrities go. The celebrities bring content for their followers to consume.

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You’re arguing quantity over quality. I do not care the least for bootstrapped growth at the detriment of the platform. I also do not care about people who idolize and platform hop in order to follow celebrities. I suspect very few will bring with them value beyond increased traffic.

      If you want this, Reddit is still an option available to you.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Quantity is quality, if you have good filters in place.

        I never understood people that argue something is bad by looking at the median case. The problem of Reddit, Twitter and Facebook is not due to the amount of people they have, and they were absolutely fine until they tried to exploit their userbases.

        (Aside for @blaze@feddit.org: see what I mean about Fedi’s anti-growth and reactionary culture? Our friend here is not an isolated case)

        • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Aside for @blaze@feddit.org: see what I mean about Fedi’s anti-growth and reactionary culture? Our friend here is not an isolated case

          It’s more against having celebrities and their followers coming here en masse, which I get.

          I’ve still seen a few comments mentioning “organic grow” which seems indeed healthier

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            “oh, I want it to grow, I just don’t it want to grow with people that I don’t like”

            You can dress it however you want, it’s still elitist, reactionary and exclusive.

            • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              The other night 337K people all registered to vote, simply because Taylor Swift sent one message on instagram.

              That’s the example used by OP to make their point. Just from a technical perspective, how are instances supposed to handle 300k new users overnight?

              To come back to your usual argument, do you expect those hundreds of thousands of new users to get a Communick subscription? Or to even support the hosting costs of the instances they would use?

              • rglullis@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                how are instances supposed to handle 300k new users overnight?

                They won’t. Not at first. First we will get maybe 50k, LW will do their thing and try to gobble up the majority of users, alien.top can also help absorb part of this crowd and I could even finally convince some other admins to set up fediverser on their instances to help with the migration.

                But the important thing is that this type of backing from the mainstream would mean free marketing.

                do you expect those hundreds of thousands of new users to get a Communick subscription?

                All of those people, of course not. But I expect the increased user base and media attention to bring the following:

                All of those things translate indirectly into more business opportunities, none of which need to sacrifice the ideals of the open social web.