cm0002@lemmy.world to Linux@programming.dev · 2 days agoOpen source project curl is sick of users submitting “AI slop” vulnerabilitiesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1406arrow-down11cross-posted to: opensource@programming.dev
arrow-up1405arrow-down1external-linkOpen source project curl is sick of users submitting “AI slop” vulnerabilitiesarstechnica.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Linux@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square39fedilinkcross-posted to: opensource@programming.dev
minus-squareDave.@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up16·2 days ago Those who use AI to report to open source projects and flood the volunteering devs who keep the World going, should be disqualified from using those open source projects I propose a GPL-noAI licence with this clause inserted.
minus-squareDave.@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·18 hours agoPublic with conditions on behaviour which can lead to your licence being revoked, just like the current GPL. 🤷♂️
minus-squareKissaki@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-25 hours agoThe license doesn’t get revoked. It does not apply to things it does not allow in the first place. Some kind of restrictions are easier to describe and assess than others. I doubt someone that generates AI slob reports would care about the restrictions anyway.
I propose a GPL-noAI licence with this clause inserted.
so not GPL at all, then
Public with conditions on behaviour which can lead to your licence being revoked, just like the current GPL. 🤷♂️
The license doesn’t get revoked. It does not apply to things it does not allow in the first place.
Some kind of restrictions are easier to describe and assess than others.
I doubt someone that generates AI slob reports would care about the restrictions anyway.