• astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s a fundamental misunderstanding of what Section 31 is supposed to be. Sloan wasn’t a good guy. 31 actively tried to commit genocide.

      The idea behind them is that arguments of ends justifying the means and “getting dirty” to preserve higher ideals is morally, philosophically, and practically bankrupt. The Federation didn’t need 31 to win the war, and in fact, their methods would have made it much worse. Section 31 as a plot device exists to show us that there will always be those looking to use higher ideals to support terrible actions, and we must be constantly vigilant against them.

      It truly pains me how that message has been twisted, and people think Section 31 are not only good guys but also cool.

      • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The Federation didn’t need 31 to win the war

        Do we know that for certain? The cure to the virus was actually pretty fundamental to the Female Changeling ordering the Jem’Hadar to stand down. She refused to surrender until Odo linked with her and cured her.

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          i think that the existence of the disease is more of a maguffin than the point that the solution was achieved without section 31… the “problem” could have been any number of unrelated things (eg some spacial anomaly threatening the founders for some reason, etc) and the fact that it’s s31 is more an interesting plot device to create other narratives around, rather than degrading the ultimate point

    • toast@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Villains or heroes isn’t the issue. It’s the argument that we need a group that doesn’t play by the rules that apply to the rest of society that I find problematic.

      Shouldn’t we strive for a world in which the rules really do apply to all? Can’t we hope to conceive of a set of laws standards by which we should all be judged? Isn’t the world of Star Trek meant in some way to be aspirational, rather than just a reflection of what we have now?

      • MalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        We live in a world that has walls federation worlds, and those federation worlds have to be guarded.

        Who’s gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Barclay?

        • williams_482@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Who’s gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Barclay?

          Yes?

          Lieutenant Barklay and the huge, powerful, and successful paramilitary organization who employs him are exactly who is supposed to guard Federation worlds. Which is what they do.