Cool. I appreciate this design decision. If only more went that route (looking at you, Microslop)

As ai features should be. You’re the dev?

So, a feature for those who want it, but turned off out of the box for those who absolutely do not want it? Did I understand correctly?

Vlbo coam

That’s the book spine.

From Frigate’s site, regarding their paid + subscription.

Frigate+ models are trained using images from actual security cameras in use by Frigate users located all over the world.

I’m hoping this is fully opt-in, but it doesn’t say.

Edit. Image isn’t working, but it’s this one of Dwight saying mallard lol

No bias. I’m not a furry, and I totally prefer this theme over any other I’ve seen to date.

Actually, yes. I do prefer this.

$15/TB (I’m assuming USD) is incredible!

Ah whoops. Sorry about the misunderstanding

I’ve been looking for this game for so long! Thank you!

Edit. Here’s the source.

I’m going to be a little pedantic, for the sake of completeness, because I very much appreciate and value what Decronym bit did here and want it to cover any gaps that may arise (especially for newcomers).

AP doesn’t necessarily have to be wifi or wireless; I’ve used many hardwired APs. WAP stands for wireless access point, though it’s almost always shorthanded to AP (more so now, maybe, because of a dumbass song with the same name).

Autobots, assemble!

There’s a custom app for that, that’s based on Signal.

“by using this site you agree to…”

I’m not using your site. And I agree to nothing. Now, go GET for me.

Many. But if you pull on the right threat, it all comes unraveled, so you’ve got to be careful.

It’s the picnic episode, when they found out they were pregnant.

I’m not a fan, either. And, the thing is, we’ve seen similar companies pop up out of nowhere that claim to be private, but are just honeypots. The fbi did one once, and there is nothing stopping them from doing it again.

I thought about this a lot, and came to the inevitable conclusion that not naming the angel investor is the same as naming them as a government organization or an organization that makes money from privacy erosion. He didn’t say it wasn’t any of them, which lends to the conclusion that it is, in fact, one of those organizations.

Thanks!

It is puzzling. I finished reading the article, and it could be that Calyx was doing things Nick didn’t like, so left (as opposed to Nick doing things that Calyx didn’t like). But, without his statement, it’s their word against his silence. If this phone company is genuinely what he states, it could be a game changer. But I’m not going to trust it at all, until it’s fully proven and he comes out with his statement.