

for conservatives it’s only wrong if the child can consent


for conservatives it’s only wrong if the child can consent
I need a gang of the scariest looking people, to find those parents and scare the shit out of them and warn them that we’ll rerun if he’s even hurts his kids feelings again
any volunteers?
I need a gang of the scariest looking people, to find those parents and scare the shit out of them and warn them that we’ll rerun if he’s even hurts his kids feelings again
Just because your puny human brain can’t comprehend the reason doesn’t mean they didn’t have one.
one AI that always manages to draw in chess is Stable diffusion and dalle…
/j
maybe a distant future technology could compute that, Clarktech style
bes way to learn is by doing what you’re not supposed to
yhea, but engines still act as if it is an unsolved game.
while in theory, given that the number of moves is limited, in theory one colour would always win.
not to get epistemological,
but I hate that technically there’s only a limited number of moves in chess, and therefore the best move is there, maybe there’s a strategic where white will always win, but we’ll never know because the number of variations likely is larger than atoms in the universe.
hey, there is an inherent fun in maing games/programs using things that were never meant to.
once i did a CPU/RAM emulator using excel, so you could see every bit.
it was fun to make loops, and programs
OK, definitely not the farmer fault,
and this meme only works in the theory that without corporation and lobbying, farme6ars still affected by profit and it ecological devastation is still likely, look into petit bourgeoisie.
but it’s pointless to complain about something in theory, when in reality corporations are currently responsible


Making the country work? that’s socialism


as long as you keep up with the bare minimum of oil changes.
I know a family who doesn’t believe in oil changes, they go though a lot of cars


FJ cruiser nearing 150k miles.
Just changed the radio for a 160$ android system and a huge screen, and rear view camera (another 60ish), gives me 90% of all the bells and whistles I want from modern cars.


I’m running my 2008 Toyota until the engine melts a hole in the floor and I have to push it like the Flintstones


i would have guessed 10 years of the US average, was so wrong, it’s 14 and rising, it was like 6 back in 2000s.
TF happened? those multiple one in a lifetime crisis really take their toll in the economy. good thing we’re approaching another one


Found this:

looks like the average age is increasing, mot what I expected, but it is still about 14 years.
also found data for the EU, and they are about 12 years old (older in east Europe but not reaching 18, and newer in central Europe, about 10 years)


sort of makes sense ish, insurance is mostly based on what damages you can make, so it would be partly based on the average cost of cars in the area. and if the car you buy is considered safer, it actually might be cheaper insurance than an older cheaper car.
which is also a problem to solve, by less cars, smaller cars, safer streets… also a luxury law on expensive cars, so if you get a fancy luxury car there’s a limit on how much insurance will pay, so if you can afford a Ferrari, you can afford to replace it, who would everyone else have to pay extra in insurance for them?


are there?
(genuine question, not mocking)
I thought my 2008 car was old, because I rarely see older cars, don’t have statistics here, just vibe guessing that the average age of a car was much less than 20 years
might be wrong, but if I am, I am surprised
no