Good bot

And answers like this are exactly why non techies don’t join and we get posts like this. You’re the problem

The username certainly led me to interpret the first line in an entirely new way

I like induction stoves because they stick up, and I can see if it’s on from a distance because of the fire. And there less likely I would lay my hand near it.

I don’t think an induction stove is what you think it is…

Yes, I also already edited my comment with a link going into the incidents and why they’re absolute nonsense.

The model ‘blackmailed’ the person because they provided it with a prompt asking it to pretend to blackmail them. Gee, I wonder what they expected.

Have not heard the one about cancelling active alerts, but I doubt it’s any less bullshit. Got a source about it?

Edit: Here’s a deep dive into why those claims are BS: https://www.aipanic.news/p/ai-blackmail-fact-checking-a-misleading

FYI, there’s many bot accounts already reposting stuff. There was an entire instance previously dedicated to it, though I think it shut down at some point. It was not popular, most people blocked the accounts / instances and they just clogged up the feed for newcomers due to the lack of engagement.

There’s an explicit flag that can be toggled on every account to mark them as bots. If you’re acting in good faith that flag should definitely be toggled.

Did your periods (.) also escape along with the hydrogen?

Honestly I think a hurricane is a pretty good reason for a power outage.

When a hurricane took power out at a Florida veterinary clinic last year, the Lightning’s giant battery powered it back up. After an elderly man was stranded in California because his electric wheelchair’s battery ran out, a Lightning made it operational again. And during the devastating Kentucky floods in 2022, Ford deployed two Lightnings as mobile generators to support cleanup efforts.

A percentage increase is a relative increase. The thing you’re thinking of would be described as “percentage points”.

Yes, as I pointed out it is technically correct. Just a misleading first impression.

Sure! As is currently written, it gives the first impression (to me, at least) that the traffic share of Linux has jumped from x% to (x+22)%. Now I understand that this is subjective, but I believe that’s how many people would read it at first glance as well.

Again, there’s nothing technically inaccurate about it, but the 22% number there is imo distracting and tends to lead to misunderstandings. I would personally write it as “Pornhub sees Linux traffic share increase from 5% to 6% (22.4% increase) over 2025”

22.4% of 5% base, so in actuality a 1% increase. While the title is technically accurate, it’s very misleading.

So, dark mode? Nothing outrageous there.

There’s always reader / article view if you really can’t handle the colour scheme

Ok, not getting this one

Not if the episode plot hinges on them staying

Issue was fixed several months ago, but yeah it was a problem for quite a while

The picture above

Less ‘leak’ and more ‘direct from the sales pitch’