The ranges will become larger over time because “we have it”, and companies will get thousands of sections with figuratively unlimited IP addresses in them each.
𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
Somewhere between Linux woes, gaming, open source, 3D printing, recreational coding, and occasional ranting.
🇬🇧 / 🇩🇪
- 0 Posts
- 28 Comments
With this huge ranges we’ll have the same problem with IPv6 in a few years that we already have with IPv4.
𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.mlto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Minio strips away almost all features from AGPL interface and suggests people use their licensed "AIStor" service insteadEnglish8·2 months agoThey not only force their user to buy their crap, they also intentionally and maliciously frame the AGPL in a certain way.
Spicy Pillow!
I did not, but of course you can. Either by using an adapter (maybe a printable one?), or – if it is an SSD – by just placing the drive there and hld it in place with one screw.
If there already is a drive installed you want to removed and there is no spare cover, you can also print one.
(You can of course buy the parts instead of printing them. Those adapters and covers are fully standardized and widely available.)
You can create communities only on your own instance. For you that would be this link.
Do you get any error messages?
𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.mlto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Docker Hub limiting unauthenticated users to 10 pulls per hourEnglish1·5 months agoThey do it since quite some time now, right?
𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.mlto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Which reverse proxy do you use/recommend?English6·5 months agobut I’d like to give Nginx Proxy Manager a try, it seems easier to manage stuff not in docker.
NPM is pretty agnostic. If it receives a request for a specific address and port combination it just forwards the traffic to another specific address and port combination. This can be a docker container, but also can be a physical machine or any random URL.
It also has Let’s Encrypt included (but that should be a no-brainer).
I run my website as static site from within a Docker container, I wonder how I would get the information about the other containers into that site.
Do you directly serve that site from the host or do you run the script and write something in a volume the site has read access to or bind a file?
Do you guys have any suggestions?
Because I don’t like software getting in my way I just cobbled together some HTML and CSS and call it a day.
Usually you just see LibreOffice and nothing else, so it’s fine, I guess. Not a web-based editor, but usable.
Ah, I see. Not as native web application, though.
They’re using Alpine Linux, install X and Openbox and Xvnc and serve KasmVNC via Nginx and connect via KasmVNC to that X instance. LibreOffice is started in fullscreen and looks like a slightly blurry web application.
But in reality it is just a regular desktop installation with some extra things.
@fikran@lemm.ee, maybe this is a solution? I wouldn’t recommend it because it’s not really a web-based document editor.
So, LibreOffice can be used over the Internet in a web browser?
𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.mlto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Can you login to the mobile apps with selfhosted Lemmy?English2·5 months agoExactly. With directly using certbot handling all and everything fully automatically I ran my old setup with a free dyndns subdomain for quite some time without any issues.
Since Let’s encrypt nowadays is basically implemented in every reverse proxy: certificates are an absolute no-brainer.
If someone manages to buy and configure a domain to serve selfhosted content, this person will also be able to either set up certbot or use the built-in functionality of their reverse proxy.
𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.mlto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Can you login to the mobile apps with selfhosted Lemmy?English1·5 months agoIt’s 2025. Not having “real certificates” is something admins intentionally do. Since there is Let’s Encrypt available, all other solutions for non-paid certificates are obsolete.
𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.mlto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•A collection of 150+ self-hosted alternatives to popular softwareEnglish12·6 months agoThere – of course – won’t be a singular official source stating “Hey guys, we’re open core now”. You need to put this together bit-by-bit.
Here are some links for research
- Official statement on the takeover
- Gitea Enterprise/Gitea Cloud hiding features behind a cloud solution and a paywall which makes Gitea itself open-core
- Open Letter to the new Gitea owners with a summary and a reply, signed by a lot of Gitea devs and FOSS scene people.
- As @gratux@lemmy.blahaj.zone mentioned: A fork under the name Forgejo was done due to new Gitea owners did not care much about the concerns. (Started as asoft-fork but with 10.0 it became a hard fork.)
- Gitea owners made it mandaroy to remove copyright headers and set the corporation as copyright holder. Here, here, and here
𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.mlto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•A collection of 150+ self-hosted alternatives to popular softwareEnglish4·6 months agoIt falls under self hosted, at least. If it is still truly open source is highly debatable.
𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.mlto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•A collection of 150+ self-hosted alternatives to popular softwareEnglish15·6 months agoNever heard of 99% in that list.
Also, Gitea should not be there. It is a corporate -owned open core project that was hostilely taken away from the community.
𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.mltoFurry Technologists@pawb.social•Don’t Use Session (Signal Fork) - Dhole Moments10·6 months agoThe gist:
The main reason I said to avoid Session, all those months ago, was simply due to their decision to remove forward secrecy (which is an important security protocol they inherited for free when they forked libsignal).
Yet.
Like there already is one for IPv4 addresses?
I stand by my point:
No-one will ever need a /48 range.