This is the way to go

Why I love the Into trait in rust

This isn’t exactly answering your question, but one thing I see a lot of people get wrong is not knowing how to express what they’re trying to do. An example I recently ran into would be when I was trying to enforce that an input to a function is a child class of an abstract class. If you express the problem with the right vocab you won’t end up googling “how to make sure a variable is of the right type” and getting a different answer completely. I find that having taken classes and followed through books has helped me the most because the vocabulary to define my problem is ingrained in me. That’s what I’d recommend the most, is increasing exposure to concepts and vocab so that it doesn’t feel weird when you have to express a new problem.

Make sure you report this to ffmpeg directly at this link: https://ffmpeg.org/bugreports.html

I feel like this is the way. It ensures you get exposed to multiple paradigms and can help you easily switch to a language that’s more invested in one paradigm.

It takes longer to figure out what apps and data you want to keep than the actual loading of the ROM onto the phone.

They’re more reliable because you have a smaller set of things that can go wrong without all the bloatware. Now if you’re doing crazy Android magic, then I understand what you’re trying to say about the reliability part.

I’m a lobotomy but I’m trying to figure out how to decouple. I wouldn’t classify privacy behavior as being some sort of purity scale, the way you seem to be. I still use proprietary apps, not because I want to, but because I necessarily have to due to a myriad of personal reasons where the time commitment to switch is larger than the current amount of free time I want to invest in it. It’s that simple.

I understand that privacy is an angering issue, it is for me too, but its better to redirect that hatred towards the corporations and systems that want to remove privacy protections instead of a niche group of people that took one step in a set of many in their journey for their data privacy.

It isn’t really self hosting as much as it is peer to peer syncing. If you can’t connect to the internet, then you probably wouldn’t be able to use it but its a good option to consider. I don’t know your specific use case so apologies if this still doesn’t work.

I feel like you hear fuckery like that more in JavaScript.

Being able to daily drive a flip phone. They can’t mine data that isn’t there.

Honestly I never thought about the latency issue, but I probably won’t do it because of that now that you mention it. Much appreciated.

Ooh wireguard sounds like a great option

I wanted to run a pi hole to use as a DNS so that I can be ad free on any device. The problem is that with my computer or with my phone, I need to put in a specific IP address when I want to change DNS on that device.

Does anyone know how to get a static IP for their server when their ISP doesn’t allow it. I’ve found out how to use duckdns, but I want to set up my own DNS server from anywhere but I’m pretty sure it requires using a static IP.

Does anyone know how to get a static IP for their server when their ISP doesn’t allow it. I’ve found out how to use duckdns, but I want to set up my own DNS server from anywhere but I’m pretty sure it requires using a static IP.

Does anyone know how to get a static IP for their server when their ISP doesn’t allow it. I’ve found out how to use duckdns, but I want to set up my own DNS server from anywhere but I’m pretty sure it requires using a static IP.

RiMusic is great for listening to… well, music. It has a bunch of nice features, allows you to download music, and even copy your local db of what you’ve listened to to a file which is great for backing up. I thought it got abandoned by its maintainer a while ago, but it seems like it’s still an active project.

Does anyone understand the Pearson coefficient part enough to explain it? I don’t really understand why they’re measuring correlation between memory, energy, and time in that way/ how you’d interpret it.

Here’s an example of inline assembly in C++. You can write assembly inside your higher level code for performance optimizations to just doing really specific things that you can only really do at an assembly level. I’ve never done it before but it definitely is cool when people do it.

Every child born is a new Linux user