Then why are you defending it?

I’m not defending it, you were just way off base about it and then decided to double down, who’s the AI now? 😉

ChatGPT steals many of the features from other LLM’s and websites, bit like how Microsoft and Apple and Linux all copy and steal from each other

Yes, the summary is right

Great! Turns out AI doesn’t hallucinate everything, it might actually be useful! 🤣

And if that’s the case then you need not worry! If you are worried about the accuracy of a statement you can click on the links provided.

This allows you to do 2 things:

1. on things you are looking for an approximation of you get immediate results (Benefit of using AI)
2. if you would like to look further into the results you can click on the links like a regular search engine (benefit of integrated search results)

Like how many times does it need to repeat the same thing over and over again?

Because I want it to be and I like it this way :) if you prefer all responses to be more brief you can change it using the system prompt:

I asked it to say the same thing but to be brief:

The phrase suggests skepticism about AI’s ability to accurately summarize web content without introducing errors or distortions, likening the process to a “game of telephone” where information gets garbled as it passes through multiple layers (e.g., original source → AI interpretation → human sharing). The user is implying that relying on AI for this could lead to misinformation.

The cool thing is that no search engine can assist in such a personalised way like this

This is cool as heck:

Anyway thanks for your time, time to sleep

You use AI for writing prompts? That’s pretty cool, a lot of people use AI for writing prompts, a lot of writers say it’s great for getting rid of writers block

I don’t use ChatGPT, I use LM Studio which runs Local LLMs (it’s like AI you can run locally on your PC, I have solar and a solar battery so this means there’s no co2 emissions from my queries, I primarily use this for coding questions and practice, translations from Russian/Ukrainian/French, practising french, etc), then I use mistral AI second (french based), then third perplexity (american)

I also use Ecosia.org for searches as well

I asked mistralai/mistral-small-3.2 to elaborate on what you said, Is this what you meant?

The phrase “Let’s just keep adding more and more layers like a game of telephone!” is a metaphorical way of expressing skepticism or concern about the accuracy and reliability of information as it gets passed through multiple layers of interpretation, especially when involving AI systems.

Here’s what it likely means in this context:

1. Game of Telephone Analogy: In the classic “game of telephone” (or “Chinese whispers”), a message is whispered from one person to another in a line, and by the time it reaches the end, the original message is often distorted or completely changed due to mishearing, misinterpretation, or intentional alteration. The user is suggesting that relying on AI systems to search, summarize, or interpret web content might introduce similar layers of potential inaccuracies or biases.

2. Layers of Interpretation: The “layers” could refer to the steps involved in using an AI system to access and summarize information:

   • The original web content (first layer).
   • The AI’s interpretation or summarization of that content (second layer).
   • Any further human interpretation or sharing of the AI’s output (additional layers).

3. Concerns About Accuracy: The user might be implying that each additional “layer” (especially when involving AI) could introduce errors, biases, or misinterpretations, much like how a message gets distorted in the game of telephone.

4. Hostility Toward AI: Given the context you provided (Lemmy users being “strongly anti-AI”), this comment likely reflects a broader distrust of AI’s ability to accurately and reliably convey information without introducing new problems.

In essence, the user is cautioning against blindly trusting AI systems to handle information retrieval and summarization, suggesting that doing so could lead to a breakdown in accuracy or meaning, similar to how a message degrades in a game of telephone.

What do you mean?

It’s all good, Lemmy users are strongly anti-ai and are genuinely learning right now that chatgpt, mistral, perplexity etc can search the web

chatGPT: I asked my hairstylist their uninformed opinion on a world event based on overheard conversations

LLM’s have been able to search the web for a few years now

The main one outside of ChatGPT is https://www.perplexity.ai/

You can also look at hosting your version with Local LLM’s:

https://olares.medium.com/building-a-local-perplexity-alternative-with-perplexica-ollama-and-searxng-71602523e256

what do you mean? it’s like being angry that people bring up I googled something

it is luxury car though, shouldn’t be cheap

We don’t want to make Wikipedia-style appeals

do it

Well you can look at the rollout of renewables vs Nuclear in the UK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycNqII5HYMI

tldr: Nuclear power plants are expensive to build (complicated to build), expensive to run (need well trained staff to handle the complexities), the stuff that they run on (Uranium) isn’t easy to acquire, and on top of all this the waste product is difficult to dispose of, I believe in Germany for example when the power company shut down its Nuclear power plants it told the Germany government they can deal with the nuclear waste… so basically even though the german people get 0% of their power from nuclear power plants they pay every day to store the nuclear waste from previous ones that are no longer operational…

… and when things go wrong they REALLY go wrong

Coal on the other hand is relatively cheap, the technology is fairly simple, running them is fairly cheap, there’s no radioactive waste the coal power plant has to deal with etc

yep and apparently they are so popular here in Australia the dealer evdirect couldn’t keep up so BYD is taking over it all

that walking ebike is crazy

People still love Teslas there clearly

Tragedy of the commons is a tragedy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons#Climate_change

sorry mate that was a joke, not a literal statement

I disagree it’s fun, at this rate by 2035 we’ll need to pay users to use lemmy

ngl same :|

For me Mastodon and Lemmy have shown that the general population have absolutely zero interest in decentalisation, they just don’t care

Like a hive mind they simply go where other people are, if there are two crowds of people, one with 5 people and the other with 50, they will go to the one with 50, regardless if the 50 users are mingling with people like Musk and they hate Musk and don’t want to support him in any way

Just posting that made me think, if people simply go to where people are, having lots of small servers instead of one large one is actually a turn off for most people

As explained by the user below

capitalist growth-focused approach

Communities growing in size is for capitalist pig dogs!

We here at the communist-iverse prefer to die slowly with brief spurts of new users when a more popular platform makes changes before they leave again

Up the top it has software filter, if you select lemmy:

At this rate by 2035 the lemmy userbase will be depleted

Why? This subreddit is one of the few places I come across miles and the only place I consistently come across it, if I had a bot it could auto translate from miles to KM and then I can go back to ignoring miles all together :)