

I can’t figure it out by searching, but I think ktfmt can do this?


I can’t figure it out by searching, but I think ktfmt can do this?


You jest, but China produces everything on the quality spectrum, from garbage to great stuff. We’ve literally ceded all manufacturing to them. Also, the cheap trash from Temu or Shein is going to be taking a flight


That’s mostly a matter of regulation though - there’s no necessity for this type of fuel to be used in shipping, other types of combustion fuel would work fine, but this type of fuel just so happens to be really cheap because no one else wants it.
We could ban it, and shipping would still be basically completely fine.
That being said, we should still aim for electrification, but electrification is not a prerequisite to phase out HFO


Anyone know if it fairs better on Android TV these days?

Patently ridiculous claim.
For being an allegedly cold nation, there sure are a lot of Canadians who appear to not be able to cope with the cold whatsoever.


You’re going to be sabotaging yourself if you don’t use Android Studio.
Non-engineering positions
Big tech pays large amounts of money. This is why people choose to work there.
I mean, with large swaths of big tech companies running monorepos, does this statement really stand up to scrutiny?
For one data point, Google has >2 billion slocs in their monorepo.


Getting bought is often the whole point for a founder, since that’s one of a few ways for you to get a big payday.
Getting bought only really happens if a majority of the shareholders agree to it, so you can reject it as much as you want.

Chinese EVs have massive tariffs in the west, so I wouldn’t count on this actually happening, unfortunately.
It is the coolest crime after all
It’s mostly a skill issue for services that go down when USE-1 has issues in AWS - if you actually know your shit, then you don’t get these kinds of issues.
Case in point: Netflix runs on AWS and experienced no issues during this thing.
And yes, it’s scary that so many high-profile companies are this bad at the thing they spend all day doing
You enable it using git config, after that it will apply to whatever frontend you’re using.
Depending on how structured your commits have been, it can either be very difficult to get a rebase through or a complete breeze. There are some features to make it easier - rerere being the main one I’m thinking about.
What’s your mental model for a Git commit, and a Git branch?
Once I properly learned those two concepts, understanding rebases became a lot easier.
I’ll try to explain it to the best of my abilities.
When you rebase a particular branch, what you’re essentially doing is taking all of the commits that are currently on your branch, checking out the other branch, and then applying each of the patches in order on that new branch.
A rebase can be cleanly applied if the premise for each commit has not changed when applied, but if the premise has changed, you get a conflict to be resolved before being able to continue the rebase.
I mentally model a rebase a bit as a fast version of how it would look like to build the branch I was on, but on top of the branch I’m rebasing on.
I’m guessing this is in reference to a scenario where a review of the PR has already been performed, and the rebase+force push is made to introduce new changes to the PR, possibly to address PR feedback.
I agree that these changes should be made in separate commits, for the benefit of the reviewer.
There are other scenarios where rebases are appropriate though, such as getting potentially incompatible changes from the main branch into the PR, and here I believe a rebase+force push is the right tool for the job.
Force pushing is necessary when using rebases, and rebases are an essential tool, so you should not be afraid to force push under normal circumstances.
If you’re into sports, then the more advanced metrics are quite helpful.
Stuff like pacing for runs, pre-programmed workouts, measuring training load over time, etc.