Well, based on what I saw and heard, I just don’t think I can make the logical leap to where everyone else is at. There’s also a large possibility that I’m not comprehending the subtlety involved in their messaging and language.

Overall, assuming I understand correctly, the argument is that Rossmann performs damage control for a fascist-adjacent millionaire who has a shitty software license for projects he funds.

I disagree with that take, and I suppose we just leave it there. Thanks for providing the link, at least.

I watched the whole thing.

Perhaps in my adult addled old age, my comprehension and cognitive abilities have drastically diminished.

Which part is the part where Rossmann is “guilty” of what you and others who share your opinion are accusing him of?

Can you link them (if you have time)?

Sure.

The 2nd part is indeed what DeVault is claiming, to be clear.

“Regularly doing videos” is too strong; this video and 1 other are the only I’ve personally seen talking about Wolf. This one’s in the comments section. The other one he did address, in video, Wolf’s financial sourcing just before he moved from New York, I believe. Please post more if you know of anymore, but to me, it reads like you’re grasping at anything to find reasons to justify your enmity towards Rossmann.

If you disagree, of course, that’s fine. If you just don’t like Rossmann, sure. We can leave it at that. But I don’t think he’s an “apologist” or “fascist adjacent”, as DeVault describes him.

Responding to this part:

Rossmann doing damage control for shitty stuff Eron Wolf did.

I disagree that it’s “damage control”, or that Rossmann is an authoritarian or techno-feudalist apologist.

I disagree, based on Rossmann’s own comments about Wolf through his YouTube Channel and watching his content for the better part of a decade.

I’m prepared to revise my stance on Louis, but I haven’t seen any evidence for him “going to bat” for authoritarians and techno-feudalists in any tangible sense, ever.

It’s always young people incapable of nuance who are largely unapologetic authoritarians in their own right presenting flimsy “gotchas” that have no ground under scrutiny, such as Louis’ words above.

Simply put, for some people, it’s never enough.

The “No True Scotsman”, more technically known as an “Appeal to Purity”, logical fallacy seems to pervade the entirety of political discourse these days.

deleted by creator

Their (tankie) downvotes mean nothing. We’ve seen what makes them cheer.

I’m an admirer of Louis Rossmann and his efforts. In my opinion, he doesn’t deserve this criticism from Drew DeVault:

They (FUTO) push an open-washing narrative and they portray themselves as a grant-making institution when, in truth, they’re passing off a handful of small donations as if they were endorsements from dozens of respectable, high-profile open source projects, in an attempt to legitimize themselves, and, indirectly, legitimize people they platform like Curtis Yarvin.

I suppose Wolf and Rossmann are “no true leftists”, but to tell the truth, I’d love to hear @FUTO@peertube.futo.org 's response to this. For added context, this is what Mr. DeVault claims to be Louis Rossmann’s “milquetoast response” (his words, not mine) to Wolf inviting Rossmann to debate Yarvin:

10:30 and 16:30 25:52 and 37:35 were my points.

To answer some questions:

1. 23:20: I had no idea what this was even about or who curtis was until I got on stage. He was supposed to debate destiny, who is a prominent progressive neo-liberal politics streamer, whose views are the antithesis of curtis yarvin’s in almsot every way. I’ve spoken to destiny on youtube & in person before. he was supposed to debate yarvin(which is what was up on the screen). He didn’t show up, so someone asked if I wanted to go on stage in his place. I had no idea who any of these people were or what the topic was until about 4 minutes into this.

2. I believe at one point I had said that I believe that the concept of a monarchy makes no sense because government is a monopoly on force which is why it is NOT analagous to a corporate CEO, who only has a monopoly(until kicked out) on how the company runs. A corporate CEO or the director of a movie has no monopoly on force. I don’t see that here. It also cuts off fairly suddenly & the link to the original is gone. I think the entire monarchy thing is ridiculous & stupid.

3. I was there because the person who donated a million to my right to repair non-profit asked if I wanted to go to some messily organized event. I thought this was very stupid after seeing a trailor at PGwlAb-rUTE (youtube URL will be censored if I post it here, just put that in the search bar to find it), but showed up since I was asked by Eron. Eron will admit himself this was completely ridiculous.

4. The person who arranged this entire event was on the left, you’d have to see the original video to get what I’m saying here; he seems like a very nice kind guy but who also seems like he melted his brain on psychedelics. This event was a representation of this. This event was an absolute ridiculous mess that I had no idea what the point even was for it. mutahar did a decent coverage of it with content from the original ridiculous video.

5. this event had little to no food and mostly alcohol like some weird yuppie startup events, i hadn’t eaten all day and was mostly excited to get out of there. you can probably tell by my foot tapping i was waiting for this to be over & gtfoh.

I think “coasting” is a bit too strong.

Furthermore, to clarify, I think people should be allowed to be dicks (verbally). I also think they should face the consequences of being a dick.

Nerfing “toxic” language with the weight of law is too much, but public shunning and/or an employer’s ire are absolutely consequences that people should face with the same stoic fearlessness that they purport to have when they’re being dicks to other people. In this case, (I think) he is the owner of the kernel repository. His word is in fact law when it comes to pull requests. He can be a dick if he wants to, so long as it complies with Finnish law on slander, libel, inciting violence, etc. And, of course, we, the public, are free to judge him on it.

I read what he said. I also read the pull request in the code that he was talking about. I also noted how late the pull request was submitted. He’s harsh but also absolutely right, in this case.

What I can’t stand is the performative pearl clutching and virtue signaling that people love to masturbate to.

It’s a simple premise. As said in the gif I posted, “He’s outta line, but he’s right.”

Fuck that.

Too many people with brittle spirits performatively clutch their pearls to the point of banality when they’re called out on it.

Operational security requires robust peer review of codebases and their potential vulnerabilities. Small distributions haven’t had the scale of scrutiny required to entrust them with incoming, outgoing, and stored private information.

Linus doesn’t have to be a dick all the time. However, as I get older, I begin to understand the wisdom behind a monologue in Team America: World Police more and more:

We’re dicks! We’re reckless, arrogant, stupid dicks. And the Film Actors Guild are pussies. And Kim Jong Il is an asshole. Pussies don’t like dicks, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes: assholes that just want to shit on everything. Pussies may think they can deal with assholes their way. But the only thing that can fuck an asshole is a dick, with some balls. The problem with dicks is: they fuck too much or fuck when it isn’t appropriate - and it takes a pussy to show them that. But sometimes, pussies can be so full of shit that they become assholes themselves… because pussies are an inch and half away from assholes. I don’t know much about this crazy crazy world, but I do know this: if you don’t let us fuck this asshole, we’re going to have our dicks and pussies all covered in shit!

In this case, Linus is a dick who fucks when it’s not appropriate a lot (i.e., is harsh in his critique about bad code in pull requests). Assholes push bad code, and sometimes it’s so bad that it’ll fuck up the whole kernel. Pussies in tech magazines criticize his style of critique. Other pussies get “butt-hurt” because they code like shit too and they can’t or won’t admit it, and they’re so full of shit, they’re pussies who’ve become assholes themselves.

The code in question is, in fact, garbage.

x11vnc, when I finally come back to it after trying damn near every remote desktop application on the market:

$ ./clears_throat.sh

The engine doesn’t suck. I do. I suck.

I use X11 over Wayland on KDE Neon for RustDesk compatibility. The Wayland support for that application is still in Beta from what I understand.

Are there other reasons why I should keep X11? I am on AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with a RTX 3090 FE on 570-open drivers, for reference.

“Why not write Assembly then?”

Oh, here comes the genius motherfucker with the big-brain counterargument: “Well, if HTML’s so great, why not just write everything in Assembly, huh?”. Wow, look at you, you clever little prick. Did you come up with that all by yourself? Writing web pages in Assembly is like using a fucking scalpel to slice your overcooked steak: sure, it’ll get the job done, but you’re gonna look like a complete asshole while you’re at it. HTML just works, you absolute tool. It’s been the backbone of the web since Al Gore flipped the switch, and it’ll still be here long after your trendy framework is rotting in a GitHub graveyard. So take your smartass logic and shove it. HTML’s king, and you’re just a peasant with a keyboard.

🤣

Just fucking use HTML.