It establishes trust. It can help differentiate people if you arent great with names. It can show them you care about the meeting. It can reinforce accountability when you know you will be updating someone face to face.
I understand the stance that these things seem superficial but i think thay can be true or false depending on who you are working with, the industry you are working in, and your position.
To be clear, I think it would awesome to not have these things be a factor.
That autonomy does sound nice, but it still seems dependent on the environment whether or not participation/engagement is voluntary.
Most of my meetings dont require cameras, some do, because it can make sense to have them on like if im working with a large client or something.
Ah thank you so its just a convention.
Im unfamiliar with this as well. If you are allocating memory for a stack, why does it matter which direction it populates data? Is this just a convention?
Im glad to hear tenure allows you recluse yourself at your specific position and employer at this time.
I think that depends on the environment, so if you are decreeing a univeraal law, I would disagree.
Idk, human connection and engagement with life and stuff i guess.
Finally some god damn recognition
Aaron for the love of god please read it
I don’t know
Any guesses if this is automated stupidity or a strategic stance by Meta?
Graph
My boss frankly trusts me too much and doesnt care if cameras are on or not. Its not that weird that people have different ways of dealing with telecommute. I personally want to wfh all the time but some time in office has helped me get better at my job. Even like overhearing how people handle stuff exposes me to situations i havent seen yet. But whatever i realize im going against a lemmy trope.