Honestly to play devil’s advocate, California’s law almost is the lesser of 2 evils, if software can ask the OS for age verification then maybe companies will stop rolling out actually invasive verification, and if the OS verification is handled by the sysadmin then it satisfies both sides, people that want to have age verification, and people that think it should be left in the hands of parents as a parenting role. Me personally? I’d rather we have no verification at all but that isn’t the path the world is moving down.

Are the https requests being sent to an IP address assigned to node B? If so you either need an nginx reverse proxy on node B or NAT with port forwarding.

This is a really interesting idea. As a fellow developer I like the sentiment, what licenses exist that are anti kyc?

Google figured out the translation for me lol…and yes I know I made your point… although as I said in another comment I do try to be noob friendly…that just only applies to noobs.

LMFAO, I do try to be friendly to noobs…but I am naturally a pedant and so when not dealing with noobs I let the pedant out a bit more. But I do agree with the sentiment that the power users are not welcoming.

Computer engineering is typically hardware and low level software design which doesn’t really fit the analogy you’re going for.

Screw with AI scrapers? Maybe, screw with my ability to read the sentence without active effort? Definitely…and it’s annoying as hell

The web is not open source by definition, I mean sure in theory it is but if you’ve ever tried to reverse engineer minified js I’m not sure it’s all that much better than dalvik bytecode. It is easier to re than native code…but then wasm exists so again is the web that much better?

Is it just me or does its top bar with the settings n stuff hide behind your notification drawer so you can’t do anything other than click start scanning?

Oh god, as if I wasn’t scared enough about running a filesystem that got kicked out of mainline and is maintained more or less by a single dude. I’ll stick to btrfs thanks

Me: we’re on PCIe 7 now???

With x86 Macs I would agree they do…but with the ARM Macs…I’m not so sure. They’re so unique hardware wise it starts to depend on how you define PC. If you define it as the acronym “Personal Computer” then a Mac is always a PC regardless of what you run on it. If we’re talking IBM PC then modern Macs are never that. (I think the latter definition is generally more helpful as otherwise PC vs Mac makes no sense and phones become PCs etc)

Never mind the fact that you can also run Linux on a Mac…I agree with this pet peeve

I use an offline manager and now I’m really glad I do

That’s fair, I hardly ever use all because there’s just too much stuff that I’m not interested in, but I can see how having multiple accounts would get very annoying.

Maybe I’m in the minority here but at least the communities I’m in, I usually only see one post and it’s from this account. Like no one else has posted this in any community I’m subscribed to so I don’t see it as spam at all. I will say the account posts a lot but I never get duplicates which means the alternative would be for the community to be a lot emptier. I guess I just don’t see the problem.

Obviously most companies will join whatever meeting invite they get sent but all the meetings they’ve created with me are via meet (we normally use teams)

I have had calls with SUSE sales reps because I’m in the enterprise space, can confirm they use Google meet and Google workspace in general. Still not FOSS, but not Microsoft.

I feel the same, btrfs is such a core part of my system at this point it would be hard to go anywhere else

Oh my god, the worst part is I read it the lemmy way first and didn’t notice the normie meaning until I read this comment