For me it was always obvious.

I mean, Janeway was thrown into a hostile environment with basically nothing, and sometimes picked the less moral choices, to make her crew survive.

Sisko decided to ruin the lives of basically a whole planet, just because he was to arrogant to admit that he got defeated.

I think there’s a matter of context, and Sisko has no way to justify his behaviour other than “I see myself as god so I can do whatever I want”

I mean… Crimes of war Sisko?

I mean, if you have a royal family, you’re asking for this shit

I mean, when you see most programmers, you want to believe it :)

The question is more “considering the state of the world and the reality of computer programming job, should I consider becoming programmer” and the answer is no.

Unless it becomes very illegal to make hostile bots (which will never happen), the internet will be something only accessible through IDs and biometrics.

Hell, if you will.

1. Ask what was the purpose of the code
2. Delete all the slop crap
3. Make the code from scratch

“It’s quite good” “you cannot trust it”

What is your definition of good?

What a recipe for disaster…

And if the burgers are made by people who just grab random items to try to make it look like a burger, whether or not it is edible, no one would.

AI code is unreliable, unsafe, and worst of all, has no basis of even basic intelligence. I’d trust more code produced by a monkey than by an AI. Trusting AI code is like trusting a very realistic drawing of a tunnel and running into it while knowing that it’s a drawing, because “it looks like a real tunnel so it must work like one”. AI code is not code, it’s keywords scrambled together to look like code.

*most of the internet

Code is not something that you consume, it is something that you build.

You want a house made of cardboard because it’s affordable? Sure, just don’t start pretending like it’s an actual house, and don’t try to rent, sell, or lend it to anyone.

More like a search engine on LSD.

AI results are always shit when trying to find anything not completely obvious. You end up more often than not with an hallucinated reality that has absolutely no value.

“The cult of understandable things”

Yeah ok bro, sure.

Who doesn’t like a gigantic shitty code that “just works” after all?

Well yeah, the reason for the recent support of Israel was just to kill the “arabs”

AIs are effectively destroying the word, causing huge social and environmental issues.

They might not have the same individual impact, but it is unequivocally and hugely immoral.

AI “programming” is not just something that people hate.

It’s something that is wrong on a technical, moral, ecological and social scope.

It’s like saying that you don’t want racists posts to be banned because “people always complain about something, some don’t like vegetables and some don’t like racism”

I think that it’s more a matter of means than of will.

I mean, even at the start with his “build a wall and make the mexicans pay for it”, I can guarantee that if he had the support of all of the US to enslave mexicans to make them build the wall, he would have. And as the other comment mentioned, he is actively participating in an ongoing genocide.

You think that if Trump had the power of Dukat, he wouldn’t have done much worse?

The whole show is garbage so I guess they just forgot to open the lid of the can

“More deserving” =/= actually deserving

If you write code without understanding what you’re doing, to the point where an AI is achieving better results, you should question your choices.