Just a smol with big opinions about AFVs and data science. The onlyfans link is a rickroll.
I was pretty sick the first time I saw this episode as a teen - all I really remember is they stepped onscreen in those outfits and I spent the next five minutes laughing so hard I started coughing up blood then passed out. My god, the costume design on this one still brings a tear to my eye, what were they thinking.
No AI has perfect safeguards, but all the mainstream models will generally refuse requests for information about comitting suicide. They might encourage it thru indirect means or a question may avoid the safeguards, though, so it can only be described in general terms - generally they will not answer.
It was throwing a 521 so maybe? As far as I know it’s still just speculation, nobody’s been able to get ahold of the head admin that I’ve seen.
Huh. This was from a conversation with said missing admin so I may just be misremembering.
If I remember right the images are all hosted on catbox not on lemmynsfw itself. I’m not sure why they’re still accessible, I was never told how the backend was set up beyond that, but it does mean that the images are only available until catbox times them out.
It’s a really caring partner.
(nobody knows what happened, the best we have is that the head admin has been uncontactable since october and now the site is down)
I mean I’m not going to say no…
(from wikipedia)
Director Nicholas Meyer wanted the Enterprise to feel grittier and more realistic for Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991), but realizing that vision was limited by the need to use existing sets. Cinematographer Hiro Narita changed the clean, bright look of the bridge from The Final Frontier by lighting it differently in The Undiscovered Country.
My interpretation has always been that the enterprise is getting pretty run down by that point and the wear is starting to show - we see this wear happen to plenty of other Federation stations (DS9, Starbase 80, etc.) so it makes sense that in the lore such a venerable ship would be starting to show it’s age.
For sure! Decent people gotta stick up for each other on here, especially in the face of such prolific (and increasingly amusing) misinformation.
That person was also me, funnily enough!
since this is the copyright office it has no bearing on other types of established property such as license or patent law
Buddy, patents are public domain. That’s the whole point of a patent.
the office admits they are waiting for public input (the legislative body) on the matter
No they don’t - they’ve published their current rules and state that those rules are their interpretation and those rules will stand until and unless further rulings or legislation comes out to change the situation. You know, how laws work?
Being in the public domain means being there in perpetuity.
Nope!
It’s uncommon but public domain works can absolutely have their copyright restored.
No, it’s from wikipedia.
Not Copyrightable != Public Domain
Not being under copyright means it is in the public domain. That’s literally the entire definition.
The public domain is not a place. A work of authorship is in the “public domain” if it is no longer under copyright protection or if it failed to meet the requirements for copyright protection. Works in the public domain may be used freely without the permission of the former copyright owner.
invalidate the contract between the user.
Why do you keep bringing this up? Nobody else here cares and this claim isn’t in dispute - open source software can and is licensed all the time. That doesn’t change your initial claims about the output from Generative AI not being able to be held under copyright.
The only two examples in the text were AI Generated Images.
Man, it sure is weird how you ignore that they explicitly clarify that this applies to generated text too:
If a work’s traditional elements of authorship were produced by a machine, the work lacks human authorship and the Office will not register it. For example, when an AI technology receives solely a prompt from a human and produces complex written, visual, or musical works in response, the “traditional elements of authorship” are determined and executed by the technology—not the human user.
God this is satisfying. Thank you for being like this.
Hey, so here’s the official opinion of the US copyright office on this matter.
If you look at this part right here:
“When an AI technology determines the expressive elements of its output, the generated material is not the product of human authorship. As a result, that material is not protected by copyright and must be disclaimed in a registration application.”
That’s where it says that right now, generative works are ineligible for copyright.
When an AI technology determines the expressive elements of its output, the generated material is not the product of human authorship.[31]
As a result, that material is not protected by copyright and must be disclaimed in a registration application.[32]
You already responded to it?
Aight and the proof already provided shows that it is in fact considered to be in the public domain, which proves you’re wrong.
Er, no - about it not being public domain. That’s the claim you made that has been shown to be false. Trying to make it about AI being bad is the walking back.
I am wheezing, thank you for this.