• 0 Posts
  • 126 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 18th, 2023

help-circle








  • Even as fascism and capitalism are aggressively using technology to destroy our democracies and wealth equality, “liberals” continue to use our tax dollars to enrich both and build big brother FOR fascism/capitalism.

    Just like the Democrats have shifted far right for 50+ years to appease fascists in the USA — just like liberals did through the rise of nazi Germany — liberals everywhere will reject the left, embrace fascism, and abandon democracy sooner than they’ll abandon the implementation of the omnipresent mass surveillance state.

    “Scratch a liberal, and a fascist bleeds” — black panthers



  • Who’s we? You think you or I get to decide what will be censored and silenced?

    Unless the protocol is 100% open source, decentralised, user controlled by default, and resistant to unwanted censorship and propaganda, the oligarchs and corporations will ALWAYS be able to seize control and use it against us.

    If you genuinely think the solution is yet another billionaire controlled closed for-profit platform, propaganda-promoting algos, and a bunch of bootlicking gatekeepers to censor and moderate it — that can be sold, transferred, and monetised in any way, to anyone, at any time — whelp, the world must be an absolute enigma to you.


  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldBluesky just verified ICE
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Eh. I don’t use bsky, and think most current ICE staff should be imprisoned for terrorism for the rest of their lives, but I don’t want any communications services to decide which entities should and shouldn’t be verified. That’s how you end up with power-tripping mods, propaganda bubbles, and censorship (exactly what fascists are doing with X, fb, tiktok, etc).

    The goal should be an open protocol where users/orgs can sign messages cryptographically (like PGP) and every other user can decide which users, feeds, or algos they subscribe to without censorship. Like, if I subscribe to my friends and family (trusted sources), or friends of friends, I don’t want any form of moderation between them and me, but the freedom to sub to moderated topics is also necessary for public (untrusted sources) feeds/comms.









  • Sure, mods will always be necessary when it comes to public/untrusted comms, but just like I don’t want my telco or email provider to decide which/when my TRUSTED contacts can contact me, the same is true for the rest of their speech.

    You’re analogous to someone in 2013 arguing that the solution to facebooks crimes/corruption/censorship is to migrate to whatsapp…

    Jumping from platform to platform, server to server each time is a bandaid solution which is not censorship resistant, especially against some totalitarian oppressor, and benefits hostile actors the most; fracturing groups into smaller and smaller bubbles. A real fix is a solution (e.g. protocol) that enables users to view a single person/entities/orgs comms regardless of what any middleman decides. The users trust should override anyone else’s.