good idea! but you should post a link to fedibook because I found 2 other projects before the one you meant: https://fedibook.net/ and https://codeberg.org/sindum/fedibook

at first I found this: https://github.com/pwoolcoc/fedibook
a very old fork of a project that had some development since

Or at least OP could try posting where anyone who sees it wouldn’t already be participating?

why, can’t we spread the word to our friends? not like this is something only the OP should be doing

oh the so many negativity in this whole thread…

I’d be surprised if 0.1% of active users in here still use other mainstream social media.

I would be surprised if that’s the correct ratio, or anywhere near it. a while ago people were self professing they are also using other platforms. and how would people read about local news? Certainly not from Lemmy, as things stand today.

Most people are here due to privacy concerns, even just to avoid monetization by billionaires

I doubt that. me, yes, but lots were coming who just had enough of reddit’s general shitness. I have conversed with plenty people here who visibly did not care much about privacy.

Having any of the apps defeats the purpose, even if you don’t use them. That’s what OP should be pushing, for people to ensure the apps are deleted fully.

and cut themselves off of the other friends who did not move. sounds a convincing strategy!

i think most people just don’t care. we really need to spread the message.

this is how you spread the message. a challenge is a call to action, and it’s popular in the sub 40 age range.

good for you, you are not the target audience. there are masses of people unlike you

I think the first one was better, it feels less crowded and weeks more distinct

the debian cve tracker also links to that page, but they have written 7.0-rc7 besides it.

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-31431

the openwall link has some comments that talk about the delayed patches, Greg KH also commented.

and the patch to the kernel was commited on 1th of April.

are you sure? what I have seen in git patch dates is 11th for the unreleased 7.0, and yesterday for the LTS versions

tbh they could have boasted even less bytes by just having everything in a zlib.decompress()

I think they mentioned issues and pull requests

last year when Serinus changed the moderation policy that the “narrative” that trans people are not real or are mentally ill or whatever to not be considered hate speech and thus not to be removed automatically, following the similar change at Facebook.

wow, that’s wild. they do have quite a few highly questionable decisions, to put it gently. maybe we should treat them like we do .ml, and encourage people to move to other instances, while generally not participating in their communities

this defense edit does not make sense. no, volunteer foss engineers don’t need to stay clear of popular projects. if the allegations in the replies are true, I’m genuinely sorry for that, but that’s not a risk of being a foss developer, that is a risk of discussing on the internet.

if people are harassing you, you should report them to the admins.

this shit stirrer ex-googler really does not understand the signals people are giving… apparently the community response is “hilarious”, the moderators removing their toots at both instances are “overzealous” for acting upon multiple reports and giving a proper hilarious removal reason.

“everyone is dumb but me!” lol… (not a quote)

this person is really butthurt that people are telling them they have acted very irresponsibly.

It is a commercial entity, and they will never evolve the matrix standards to include an Activity Pub interface.

my point is I don’t think it’s reasonably possible

Sadly, since they are the ones approving the additions do matrix standards, they also have the power not toke that to be.

I don’t understand this. you can certainly try implementing some kind of compatibility bridge, they can’t prevent you from doing that

that’s the part I understood that way:

But no, matrix is not fediverse, it’s not compatible and will never be (my opinion) because the commercial entity behind the matrix standards has no intention to open up that much the matrix ecosystem.

Yes Matrix is not compatible with AP. Just a fact, not a judgment.

of course, I don’t debate that. but you brought that up as a conclusion of matrix not being open. and it does not make sense. matrix not being compatible with AP is not because “matrix is closed” (whatever that means), but because the own protocol of matrix works vastly differently. its an entirely different thing. both are competing protocols for communication services. surely bridges could be developed, but these just cannot be “compatible”

But no, matrix is not fediverse, it’s not compatible and will never be (my opinion) because the commercial entity behind the matrix standards has no intention to open up that much the matrix ecosystem.

not compatible with what? ActivityPub? that’s no different from XMPP

and which part of the matrix ecosystem is not open?

no they didn’t, yes it could have happened:

1. GCC: exists, not too good messages
2. rust gets made
3. rust gets popular
4. gcc error messages get improved by good example of rust

gcc is not a dead project. it is continuously maintained. its improvements can be influenced by other projects like rust

they didn’t say otherwise

preferring Rust over Rust? what do you mean?

do you think loosely typed python is easy to read and maintain?

or didn’t have a defense against a 0 day.

firewalls are not for defending against 0 days. it is about access control, and reducing, sometimes even minimizing access to potentially vulnerable services. firewalls are not an infallible security tool, but there is no such thing either. the reason to use it is to restrict access such that fewer attackers can take advantage of a potential vulnerability.

there are intrusion detection/prevention systems that could do more, but it’s unlikely they will protect against 0 days, because 0 days are undiscovered and unknown issues.

So the vlan doesn’t do anything either way.

it does. its useful to force traffic through a firewall. its for limiting what has access to what. if you wouldn’t use vlans, hosts on the network would not care about your firewall because they can just go straight to the destination.

I’m not sure I understand your argument, but I think what you say is, firewalls are not infallible so they are useless