But only accepting one possible alternative is an extreme. You can build in safeguards… but if they’re too rigorous you will drive away potential users. Much like with freedom and security, you need to middle ground between accessibility and defensibility.
If only there were some kind of middle ground… sadly only extremes exist 😔
But whattabout all the terrible things someone else does…
Yeah, America has the leading edge on neo-fascism right now, don’t get competitive about it.
I hate the company of most people. Unfortunately that includes myself.
Learn photography, probably.
Whoa, hey, no need to bring politics into it.
(/s)
That’s probably why the quote was re-imagined as referring to trans-positivity instead.
The rule of internet polls is that the funniest answer is always over-represented.
Well, yes, but they go into detail rather than just simplifying it as “This kid can’t fucking sit still, what a little jerk”
Probably a good idea not to read this comic then:
You should take some time to see the outdoors, it sounds like you’re spending too much time doomscrolling on your phone.
If you could make a movie that stays true to the idea of Star Trek while still maintaining broad enough appeal to reach a wider audience, sure.
I believe, to this day, that still has yet to be done. Without the broad appeal it’s better to just do the show, and without the ideals of Star Trek… it’s just another generic sci-fi action movie.
Not nearly enough devotion to the state on Garak’s part…
Probably just Boro-ed it.
Ohhhhh, now it makes sense. Thank you!
Why is a mouse version of the mechanic from Disney’s Atlantis doing a painting?
If there’s only ever one avenue of attack, sure. Your example posits that encryption is the only security layer that exists, which is laughable. Most security breaches happen at the personnel level, not the technical one.
A site does not “become facebook” just because it’s not 100% decentralized from every other possible service. Countless other factors go into it. Not the least of which is the nature of the people running it. If you run a service, and make it nigh impossible for a general public (your main market) to use because you fear it will become compromised, you are basically saying that you will compromise it otherwise, and probably shouldn’t be running that service.