• 0 Posts
  • 53 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2024

help-circle









  • He’s not going to comment on what other people are doing, or what the court should or shouldn’t rule on. He’s sticking to his points. Unambiguous, actionable, in his jurisdiction.

    I don’t understand why you would require him to, debate the obvious and speak about things he has little power to act on. He’d be a less effective progressive.

    He’s using the interview time to repeat facts, thousands dead, starving children, domestic funding in the billions being used for weapons. I bet people will keep asking him about genocide, since he refuses to answer. If he keeps repeating the facts about the genocide, that’s great.


  • Do we NEED to? Is he failing?

    Seems like he’s chosen to take action on the subject. He didn’t get bogged down in the word games and ambiguity of if it’s a genocide or not. Starving kids, unambiguous. You can’t argue with that.

    No problem saying, wow this is great, we need to do more.

    Big problem with, all he’s done is not enough. No, if you think that YOU can go do more.

    He’s literally out touring, organising and getting support for the exact thing you are accusing him of not doing enough of. Is he supposed to do two tours at once?