Or Artix. Or many others!
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch-based_distributions
I guess there’s a need to maintain existing systems, but I struggle to imagine a niche where recommending Manjaro to a “distro shopping” user makes sense.
I am open to criticism here… but when’s the last time y’all saw anyone defend Manjaro on a forum? It’s been years for me.
Before? It was the prominent “ergonomic” Arch Linux. But I’ve been burned by Manjaro enough that it would take a miracle for me to touch it again.
My experience is a few years out of date, but “more tested” was not the experience. It felt like they took the worst of Ubuntu and brought it to Arch: holding back packages enough to be annoying and tempt me to roll them forward/maintain stuff myself for fixes. But without any stability benefits of doing so. Stuff would break all the time and require manual intervention.
Manjaro got me to realize the Arch base is more “held back” than its reputation would suggest. The Arch maintainers do not roll out updates until every package works with every other package, and it turns out that ethos is incredibly hard to re-invent… which is what Manjaro ostensibly tries to do.
And yes. I can’t remember if AUR was a hard dependency, but it was certainly front-and-center. On Arch, you do not use AUR unless the package is self-contained (and therefore can fail to update without consequence) or if your system cannot function without it; and Manjaro didn’t exactly foster that caution. What’s more, many AUR packages were straight up broken since the base packages are different.
Thanks for the subscriber free link!
Predicting Earth’s future climate is a race against time. As climate change accelerates, improving models is essential to guide decision-making from governments, especially if we hope to control climate change.
…Do they really believe this?
Read the room. Doesn’t matter if they invent a freaking oracle, governments aren’t going to do squat as long as constituents are manipulated into not seeing it.
We are past the point of praying and hoping science will win an attention war. I feel like all this research is just pointless with the elephants in the room are dealt with.
Like others said, they’re basically the same car underneath. So it comes down to ergonomics and style; just personal preference, really.
…With the exception of the highest end. The EV6 GT is more like a luxury crossover; think a tricked out Mercedes.
But the Ioniq Ns are batshit crazy track cars. They are fast. As they point out here, it’s the only EV that can lap the Nurburgring without breaking down: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HZczpFsv9ZY
Heh. Wait for a humid day, take it around a track to stress it out, and get it to pop in-warranty.
deleted by creator
For what it’s worth, my sister’s SO got a used Ioniq 5 and loves it. It’s a gorgeous car, and a steal used.
Though nothing happened yet, they’re aware of the ICCU issue. But it’s also still on warranty, I suppose.
War is bad for the climate, and the plug is almost certainly temporary, unfortunately.
Trump is losing a lot of political capital here, but TBH I think he’s being used by everyone. US petrol got far more they paid for, Tech is getting what they paid for, and someone else will just take his place…
TVH, I hope Trump makes it.
Hell, Id rather have him for a third term than JD Vance for the next (or after the skip of however the Democrats manage to screw themselves over). Vance scares the shit out of me.
The other issue is devaluation. Ioniq5’s are worth hallf after 3 years.
Heh, yeah. They bought it used, and got a shockingly good deal on it.
TBH buying a new car feels pretty pointless to me, unless one is so critically short on “shopping” time that its worth the massive financial hit.
~70 miles. That’s how far they are from me.
And their daily commute is 25 miles in heavy traffic.
I dunno… my sibling can make it a long way on a single charge, all the way to me and back. They haven’t had to use a fast charger yet. But if they do, my understanding is that Hyundai optimized the battery for charging speed instead of capacity.
Again, playing devil’s advocate:
it saves mirror and seat positions, but not audio or temp/fan settings
This is kind of standard for cars, isn’t it?
The drive settings (snow mode, etc) doesn’t persist for some reason either.
And this makes sense because Kia wouldn’t want the car to be unintentionally stuck in snow mode by default. Folks who don’t pay attention to settings wouldn’t know what was wrong, and it follows a golden rule of software: 99% of users will use the defaults.
It sucks that it isn’t configurable, but most everything you listed is just infotainment software issues, and part of the “car software shouldn’t be so complex and proprietary, and rely more on physical knobs” general issue. We should be able to configure stuff it like we want, but for some reason car software dev is particularly awful, and here we are.
It fishtails constantly if its remotely slippery out in the winter.
And again, I’d guess this is from stock, low-friction EV tires. Which are awful in winter. This is just a guess though.
Yeah, I know all about the Slate. It’s a very cool concept.
Also see this Scottish EV: https://www.munro-ev.com/
I wish more manufacturers would take those ideas, though.
All very annoying sounding issues.
…But to be fair, these have little to do with the actual EV drivetrain. They’re ergonomic or handling issues an ICE card would have too. Or, in the case of fishtailing, just the choice of stock tires the car comes with.
I get this actually. I don’t always trust ACC; sometimes I just want to set a speed and know the car isn’t going to mess with it, and get me rear-ended.
What’s wrong with the Kia and Hyundais? There’s an Ioniq 5 in the family, and it seems great.
Anyone here (who’s ADHD) ever had the sudden realization:
“Oh… my parent is definitely ADHD. That explains a lot.”
Mine was a few years ago.