

Unfortunately it’s not very wide


Unfortunately it’s not very wide
If my friend start talking about openclaw we’re going to change the subject to something that’s actually interesting.
Telling people about your interactions with an AI is like telling people about a dream you had, it has no basis in reality and no one cares.


I wouldn’t know what it means. Why is the computer talking about itself in the third person and what letter is it wanting me to load?


It’s the tricorder before the one in TOS


Removed by mod


I think people don’t like the direction that they’re taking Star Trek in general. It was one of the few science fiction shows which was actually hopeful about the future, but the writers have decided that they can’t think of creative ways to go in that direction so they’re going to blow everything up.
It wouldn’t be so bad if it made some kind of logical sense, but they just had everything destroyed for hand wavy reasons without any basis in canon.


So, to all the outspoken trolls and haters out there, a huge Fuck You for sabotaging the entire franchise.
Surely it was the writers who sabotaged the show by producing this instead of literally anything else.


At least he weren’t trying to show teenage drama down my throat.
What I want to know is what market research they did to come to the conclusion that this would be positively received, who was the show aimed at, because it certainly isn’t Star Trek fans.


Not just because they’re new though. But because they’re badly written.


There’s so much stuff that they could have gone with and then instead they decided to go with disaster movie on a galactic scale. Ugh.


The reason people like lower deck so much is because it was obviously written by an actual Star Trek fan rather than someone trying to write generic science fiction and then slap a Star Trek aesthetic on top. Which was what discovery was like in the early days.


Oh come on it’s not that people hate new Star Trek shows it’s that they hate badly written Star Trek shows. There’s plenty of examples of Star Trek shows that people love.
At that price it would be cheeper to use humans
That would explain why it’s only American to I’ve ever heard referred to it like that. Every European developer I’ve ever heard referred to it as always called it SQL as would I.
Other DNS is definitely Dennis from now on.
If you are complete novice then obviously not but I think anyone reasonably proficient in a language would be able to identify optimisations that an AI just doesn’t seem to perceive largely because humans are better at context.
It’s like that question about whether it’s worth driving your car to the car wash if the car wash is only 10 metres away. AIs have no experience of the real world so they don’t inherently understand that you can’t wash a car if it’s not at the car wash. A human would instantly know that that’s a stupid statement without even thinking about it, and unless you instruct an AI to actually deeply think about something they just give you the first answer they come up with.
That’s a different definition of wasted though. The RAM isn’t lost just because it isn’t being currently utilised. It’s sitting there waiting for me to open a intensive task.
What I am objecting to is programs using more RAM than they need simply because it’s currently available. Aka chromium.
I mean I have access to a computer with a terabyte of RAM I’m gonna go ahead and say that most applications aren’t going to need that much and if they use that much I’m gonna be cross.
I don’t know why electron has to use so much memory up though. It seems to use however much RAM is currently available when it boots, the more RAM system has the more electron seems to think it needs.


It takes forever to boot I know that and that’s from fast food which is extra pathetic.
You still need programmers because you need people proficient in programming to be able to tell how to fix the junk that it generates into working code.