Nile should totally try this. For science.
(Kinda joking, but I would also honsetly find this really interesting)
they/them
Nile should totally try this. For science.
(Kinda joking, but I would also honsetly find this really interesting)


Well, yes; after all, I have been able to modify even proprietary software to fit my own preferences; but it’s clear (and also explicitly stated) that it’s supposed to be used mostly as-it-comes.
I can’t say I’ve tried Niri or PaperWM before, but if they’re based on GNOME then maybe I’m being a little harsh.
Thanks for the complements!


Obviously check out Eylenburg’s page and the ArchWiki, but here are my two cents on a bunch of DEs:
Note: The weight of a DE is comparitive. “Heavy” DEs (such as GNOME) can still be swift on lower spec machines.


Slackware, Gentoo, the Mandriva family (OpenMandriva, Mageia, PCLinuxOS, ROSA, ALT Linux), Void, Alpine, Chimera, Venom, CRUX, Exherbo, Paldo, the PiSi family (PiSi Linux, old versions of Pardus), and Solus (eopkg is a fork of PiSi).
Rule-wise, this seems fair.
Regardless, if AI usage continues to increase in this manner, I’ll likely be driving NetBSD, AROS, and FreeDOS by the end of the decade.
Maybe even a little TempleOS or ZealOS, for flavour.