Code reviews are important. Unfortunately, no-test-text guy convinced his whole team that he was right, and I wasn’t able to block it. I’d scheduled a meeting to try to get the wider org to adopt a more sensible standard, but then there was a mass layoff 🤷

The other guy with the bad messages is at a tiny startup where they’ve laid off almost everyone, and the other 2 guys don’t want to make waves. The CEO is big on “just ship it” (and also “why are there bugs in production? this is unacceptable!!”)

Great. Most AI is a net negative for people and crypto sucks.

I’ve worked with a few people who are just incomprehensible. One refuses to write commit messages of any detail. Just “work in progress”. Cast him into the pit.

There was another guy that refused to name his tests. His code was like

describe(''. () => {
  it('', () => {
     expect(someFunc()).toEqual(0);
  }
 it('', () => {
    expect(someFunc(1)).toEqual(0);
  }
 it('', () => {
   expect(someFunc("").toEqual(1);
 }
}

He was like, “Test names are like comments and they turn into lies! So I’m not going to do it.”

I was like, a. what the fuck. b. do you also not name your files? projects? children?

He was working at a very big company last I heard.

edit: If you’re unfamiliar, the convention is to put a human readable description where those empty strings are. This is used in the test output. If one fails, it’ll typically tell include the name in the output.

Friends are almost all on signal. Parents are bad at technology and can barely figure out sms.

I wish they continued to follow them in a different show

“Middle Decks” ?

One time I saw critically acclaimed author N. K. Jemisin give a talk, and someone asked her about climate change. She said something like, “There’s a few hundred people responsible for this problem, and we know where they live.” The crowd burst into applause and the moderator scrambled to distance the org from this idea. Good times.

From what I read, at the time of the Kent State Massacre, something like 60% of americans blamed the students.

I think tech solutions will only go so far. This tracking stuff needs to be illegal, and that needs to be enforced

There’s that poem(?) about that

“”"

“Get off this estate.”

“What for?”

“Because it’s mine.”

“Where did you get it?”

“From my father.”

“Where did he get it?”

“From his father.”

“And where did he get it?”

“He fought for it.”

“Well, I’ll fight you for it.”

“”"

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/9358361-get-off-this-estate-what-for-because-it-s-mine-where

You know how scam emails intentionally include mistakes because they want to filter out smart people? Same idea.

Reasonably smart people will see this and go “this is garbage”. The idiots will go deeper, and become loyal gop voters.

Per wikipedia

In 1845, the Southern Baptists separated from the Triennial Convention to uphold the institution of slavery

So they’ve always sucked.

This was my thought as well. Star Trek still has people dying of old age. I’m pretty sure the culture let’s you go as long as you want.

I’d think this would be redundant with existing first amendment rights, but clearly those weren’t enough. Good for Oregon.

I can’t speak for everyone, but for me, in my youth, it helped to actually go out and do the things I was worried about. When I spent all my time home worrying, I just got worse. Once I left the house, went to the party, went on the hike, whatever, I found the reality wasn’t anywhere near what I had worried about

“Use a different language” is a common defense of javascript, but kind of a weird one.

Yeah. My last job, a PR with commented out code typically wouldn’t get approved. Either leave it in version history, or stick it on a branch

Yes, being out and visible is helpful. You can form bonds, and get people off the fence when they see they’re not alone, or you’re just people like anyone else. But as I said, that’s not enough on its own.

Without the plausible threat of action, you will be ignored. Action could be violence (eg: throwing a brick at a cop), or economic (eg: we’re all going to stop working for you, we’re all going to stop spending money at your business). But there needs to be something.

When it’s just “we meet up for an hour on saturday, sing, and go then home,” that’s just not very effective on its own. You can sing and dance, but there needs to be a backing of “If you don’t treat us well, we can hurt you” if you want to be taken seriously.

Call the function from the if block.

Now your tests can more easily call it.

I think at my last job we did argument parsing in the if block, and passed stuff into the main function.

This doesn’t seem like a good idea.

One, releasing should be easy. At my last job, you clicked “new release” or whatever on GitHub. It then listed all the commits for you. If you “need” an Ai to summarize the commits, you fucked up earlier. Write better commit messages. Review the changes. Use your brain (something the AI can’t do) to make sure you actually want all of this to go out. Click the button. GitHub runs checks and you’re done.

Most of the time it took a couple minutes at most to do this process.