

26·
28 days agoFor that you’d need a much more advanced “reasoning…” message.


For that you’d need a much more advanced “reasoning…” message.

Sorry, still working on cardio.

This seems to be as close as they get:
This serves as a litmus test for the report’s scientific credibility. A commitment to scientific integrity requires the authors to produce a point-by-point response to the expert comments, overseen by an independent review editor.
A refusal to do so would suggest that the report should be viewed as an advocacy piece rather than a scientific document, and its conclusions should be treated with caution.
iftheycouldread.gif


Yes. Except that cursor is running at a loss and so is the company running the LLM that they pass all the work on to.
I just woke up in Italy on that date, and had not heard about this, so I tried a couple of obvious sites and no verification. I even tried a couple from their posted list and nothing. (Also, some domain names I didn’t expect to be typing)
Now what? Will they attempt to block those sites?