How do you see that and this is your reaction?
- 0 Posts
- 45 Comments
It’s too unregular and too good to be a coincidence. Unless they threw an algorithm on it that was intended for whatever
You know about neo-pronouns, get ready for neo-months
I assume the post is the maximum. I wonder if there is an algorithm for that
I think you can use the white space so it’s “[ ]april”
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com•ChatGPT and other AI tools could be putting users at risk by getting company web addresses wrong1·10 days agoThe difference is that there is intend in the case of google, LLMs will just halucinate anything. Always double check dates and facts LLMs give you (or just check them somewhere else in the first place)
For those who aren’t aware: Matrix has always been intended as trans metaphor. The pill is red became estrogen pills have been red back then
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.comto Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com•ChatGPT and other AI tools could be putting users at risk by getting company web addresses wrong12·13 days agoWait, people ask chatGPT for URLs??
I have to admit, I made it up. I don’t even speak Nahuatl. Pretty sure psychopatl isn’t a word in that language. I was spreading misinformation on the internet and you caught me, well done. Another victory for Truth
No, it’s “psychopatl” that’s Nahuatl for psychopath. Pretty sure it’s a Mexican, they have quite a few loan words
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.comto TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world•He's fun to visit14·21 days agoThere is a term for this. Status quo bias or something
German has a word for it: Insektensterben
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.comto TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world•Oh no!27·23 days agoHow many layers are we talking about? Four? Five?
Is this for people identifying as planets but are not read as such?
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.comto TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world•Unless it's just too inconvenient2·2 months agoI like that story because it shows how important it is to take as many perspectives into consideration as possible. True, we don’t know everything and I would argue, this isn’t about knowing more than others in a linear/hierarchical sense, but the whole knows more than the sum of its parts. It’s crucial to take the local perspective into consideration and the paternalistic aspect of the prime directive isn’t necessarily the conclusion itself but jumping to conclusion without involving the locals. This makes it more complex than it might sound since the locals aren’t a monolith. But every decision is paternalistic unless you are willing to really listen to those affected.
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.comto TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world•Unless it's just too inconvenient11·2 months agoThis is the fallacy fallacy. Instead of engaging with anything I said, you acuse me of the ad hominem fallacy. No seriously, where do I attack the person? I attack their line of thinking and the terminology but if that’s ad hominem, what isn’t?
Also: if you can’t handle engaged arguments, maybe don’t use the internet, or maybe you should grow up. This is so typical for sh.itjust.works users.
lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.comto TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world•Unless it's just too inconvenientEnglish4·2 months agoThis leans into a critic, Picard Season 1 and Lower Decks tries to address: TOS and TNG have this Alien of the Week, First Contact attitude: I came, messed around, and left. Sure, given that “I don’t care about consequences” attitude, not messing too much is a good idea. But maybe the given is the problem and eye level relationship just works differently.
Neither am I but much less am I used to the day starting at 0