Neither am I but much less am I used to the day starting at 0

How do you see that and this is your reaction?

It’s too unregular and too good to be a coincidence. Unless they threw an algorithm on it that was intended for whatever

You know about neo-pronouns, get ready for neo-months

I assume the post is the maximum. I wonder if there is an algorithm for that

Febroctobus

I think you can use the white space so it’s “[ ]april”

The difference is that there is intend in the case of google, LLMs will just halucinate anything. Always double check dates and facts LLMs give you (or just check them somewhere else in the first place)

TIL, thanks!

For those who aren’t aware: Matrix has always been intended as trans metaphor. The pill is red became estrogen pills have been red back then

Wait, people ask chatGPT for URLs??

I have to admit, I made it up. I don’t even speak Nahuatl. Pretty sure psychopatl isn’t a word in that language. I was spreading misinformation on the internet and you caught me, well done. Another victory for Truth

No, it’s “psychopatl” that’s Nahuatl for psychopath. Pretty sure it’s a Mexican, they have quite a few loan words

There is a term for this. Status quo bias or something

German has a word for it: Insektensterben

How many layers are we talking about? Four? Five?

Is this for people identifying as planets but are not read as such?

I like that story because it shows how important it is to take as many perspectives into consideration as possible. True, we don’t know everything and I would argue, this isn’t about knowing more than others in a linear/hierarchical sense, but the whole knows more than the sum of its parts. It’s crucial to take the local perspective into consideration and the paternalistic aspect of the prime directive isn’t necessarily the conclusion itself but jumping to conclusion without involving the locals. This makes it more complex than it might sound since the locals aren’t a monolith. But every decision is paternalistic unless you are willing to really listen to those affected.

This is the fallacy fallacy. Instead of engaging with anything I said, you acuse me of the ad hominem fallacy. No seriously, where do I attack the person? I attack their line of thinking and the terminology but if that’s ad hominem, what isn’t?

Also: if you can’t handle engaged arguments, maybe don’t use the internet, or maybe you should grow up. This is so typical for sh.itjust.works users.

This leans into a critic, Picard Season 1 and Lower Decks tries to address: TOS and TNG have this Alien of the Week, First Contact attitude: I came, messed around, and left. Sure, given that “I don’t care about consequences” attitude, not messing too much is a good idea. But maybe the given is the problem and eye level relationship just works differently.