opinions will vary on what constitutes poor treatment of an animal, but i think everyone would agree that “Treating animals poorly is not appropriate.”

treating animals like animals is absolutely appropriate

it’s how people justify slavery

comparing slaves and trans people to animals is gross.

you probably aren’t going to be the target of an investigation, but don’t take my fucking picture

look into static site generators

I appreciate you. fuck the haters

it’s a meta study of LCA studies, but the guidance for LCA studies is that they cannot be combined because they have disparate methodologies.

your last link depends on poore-nemecek 2018, a paper with dubious methodology.

I didnt

that’s your lifestyle though. some people are too time-poor to spend time at home on cooking

2 gas station hotdogs cost $1 and is a 500+ calorie meal.

no, they are saying the corporations aren’t polluting on our behalf

they didn’t ask me

Rice, beans, pasta, bread, and potatoes are the cheapest foods.

if you cook all your food.

all news is propaganda

absurd ideological basis (anarchy supporters)

I am not a community but can you please add me to your list

they follow their own processes, use their own research, and come to their own conclusions based on what they consider to be the best available evidence.

some of that evidence was a paper which has since expired. if those organizations aren’t updating their positions at least as frequently as the AND is, then we cannot believe that their positions are any more valid than the expired AND paper that they relied on

the expired paper doesn’t matter. It has no relevance

it’s the exact paper linked in the initial comment to which I replied.

And the page about childhood nutrition:

I wasn’t reading carefully. I missed this. it doesn’t change whether the other paper expired, is the current position of the academy, or whether papers that relied on it should be considered reliable unless they update.