• 2 Posts
  • 124 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 14th, 2025

help-circle
  • Sorry I don’t really understand what your argument actually is.

    Since the dawn of writing, legislators (kings / politicians) have laid down the rules. Regulators (police, tax office) have enforced the rules. And courts decide whether the rules have actually been broken and what the penalties ought to be.

    In the vast majority of self assessment situations, it’s very obvious how the law applies to ones situation, there is very little doubt. You just follow the rules and face penalties for breaches.

    In those few situations which are unclear, you generally have a range of options:

    • review other similar cases heard by courts which might be analogous to your own.
    • consult a specialist who can interpret and apply the rules for you.
    • ask the god damn regulator where you stand and have them help you self-assess.

    Finally, most legislation relating to corporate behavior has safe harbor clauses. That is, where someone has acted reasonably, taken reasonable steps, and made a good-faith attempt to interpret and apply the rules correctly, the regulator won’t penalise them even if they’re found to have breached the rules.

    That is to say penalties are usually only applied where there’s a breach, and there’s no scope to argue that it was a reasonable error.

    This is a fair and transparent structure with which to ensure the rules are applied fairly to everyone. It’s very robust, tolerant of edge cases, and the most efficient compliance structure we have.

    I don’t really know what an alternative would be? If you want a regulator to publish a list of which apps / companies are effected in what way, that’s just nuts. The antithesis of modern democratic economic regulation.





  • This is the right way to make laws and rules.

    It’s the same way we do tax - self compliance. You self report but if you’re caught breaking the rules then you face punishments.

    If the administration just made a list of who’s effected, it would be perpetually incomplete. This way, everyone is effected.

    They can’t just unilaterally decide that your self assessment is “wrong” without explanation. Also their decisions about who is effected are public, and can be relied on by others to self assess.


  • When I first became aware of this project I was pretty dismissive.

    I’m very happy to admit in this case that the project has come further than I thought it would.

    Their FAQ says they have 8, paid, full time devs and resources for something like 18 months. IDK how much it really takes to get a browser off the ground but they’ve got something, at least.

    I’m looking forward to their Alpha release in 2026, and really hope they can achieve that.




  • I’m been trying to stand up a zulip instance. It’s working but I haven’t used it much. I want a feature complete jitsi instance to go with it and that’s only partially implemented right now.

    That said, zulip does seem like the best option for me presently.

    Haven’t tried revolt.

    Mattermost seems to be perpetually entangled but being disentangled from some other suite. Confusing and frustrating.

    I haven’t tried rocket chat for 5 years or so. I think last time I read about it people were complaining that the FOSS plan is very limited.





  • Adding to what everyone else has already said, you want sync and backup.

    Sync to a central location and backup from there.

    For sync, you want syncthing or nextcloud. I would lean towards syncthing for media. If you had a million files in a complex folder structure and a dozen users with different access requirements and instant sync and collision protection is important then nextcloud might be the go. Otherwise syncthing is much more manageable.

    My recommendation with syncthing, which is not obvious, is to set up a single hub which each client syncs with. By default you end up with a mesh where everything is connected to everything. It’s very difficult to manage with a lot of folders and devices. Turn off discovery and input the server / hub details manually.

    For backup, if you have a lot of media you want deduplication. If yesterday’s backup included ABC and today’s is ABCD you only want to transfer D. This is similar to an incremental backup, but the subtle difference is that with deduplication the most recent backup is the “full backup” with the “diffs” going backwards in time, allowing you to purge old backups. I like borgmatic but there are others.

    I would also consider carefully exactly what is worth backing up on what service. I don’t backup movies and tv series at all.

    My final recommendation is, it’s critically important to test deploying your backups regularly.






  • I do use nextcloud for my small consultancy team but I dislike it immensely, mostly due to personal preferences.

    I think I pretty much just don’t like having one platform that does everything. I want to self host my own cloud, I don’t want to self host a thing that provides a cloud.

    Additionally, and this really is just a personal preference, I dislike php projects almost as much as Java.

    Primarily I use nextcloud’s file sync. This aspect is IMO extremely well implemented. It seems to work very reliably.

    We do use contacts and calendars. If there were good alternatives I would switch to them but sabreDav et al lacks a good UI. I’m aware you can disable this functionality in nextcloud.

    Anything else that can potentially be integrated is better hosted separately IMO.


  • I don’t have ADHD (at least I don’t really think I do) but it’s very relatable to me too.

    As in most things I’m sure ADHD exacerbates this, but I think it’s also just part of life in a modern era.

    I only have so much brain power to spend in a given day. I’m sure everyone is the same, neuro divergent or normative. Some tasks are burn through more brain power than others.

    I have lots of ideas about things I ought to do, but ultimately I just don’t have the bandwidth.