
No, not overwhelmingly. Partly. That’s what the article and a bunch of studies claim.
No, not overwhelmingly. Partly. That’s what the article and a bunch of studies claim.
The thing is, he’s got the power to influence the world for the better but he’s not doing it. “Part of the problem or part of the solution” applies to him at the very least a thousand fold.
Right, but I’m not all the poor people. And I can’t control them either. Yes, if everyone stopped eating meat, we’d stop farming them and emissions would drop. But that’s unrealistic, never gonna happen. So yes, my impact in negligible.
And I’m not saying I won’t do anything because my impact is negligible. I still recycle and encourage others to do the same and so on. But realistically speaking, I’m nobody. What I do doesn’t change anything. At most I may have influenced 10 other people to be eco friendly. Still didn’t change anything in the grand scheme of things. But maybe once a few more million people do the same we’ll be ok. We’ll see.
And the private jet flights and the monster boat are nothing?
And what about all the money he gave to Trump and to other politicians to influence policy decisions?
You can’t really blame individuals for society issues. If I drop dead tomorrow, the global emissions won’t change. Still the same amount of cows, still the same amount of cars on the road, still the same governments and policies.
Not saying we shouldn’t do anything as individuals, we definitely should, we can all do better. But you can’t blame any one random individual for any of these issues, imo(non multimillionaire, I mean). Feels so wrong.
No, this is what those companies said and did. Let’s not pretend they’re powerless, lol.