You are being very tedious, and none of you have added a single thing to the discussion of this article. I put my thoughts on your journalism meme in other replies here anyways. I hope you try contributing something worth reading next time, although I won’t see any of your posts again thanks to this handy anti annoyance button right here 🚯

I’m not sure why you are so keen on insubstantial meta-commentary

Funny because the guardian insisted for years that carbon capture is our only hope, meanwhile China was the only country cutting emissions despite manufacturing everything anyone on earth demanded

That’s what the article is about. It also goes into biomass energy land use and the unknown effectiveness of grinding up rocks + laying them on farmland

Great thing to say for redditors who have zero original thoughts and cannot contribute to any topic in depth

I think their point is that this stupid internet meme based off of a random tech writer - akin to Cory Doctorow’s “enshittification” - is not even backed up by its own citation

Wikipedia is such a shithole…

No Canadian should be delusional enough to think their country’s forestry is even cutting carbon emissions. There’s a problem with first world energy use here

Do you think it would be enough to help people in areas with inconsistent power? I never really thought about bolstering power storage away from the center of the grid.

For email I try to at least proxy my addresses and then encrypt it on the way to my real email account, but I basically just do that for fun without knowing if it really helps. To complete my privacy LARP, I log into my email via ArcaneChat, which plans to support XMPP at some point in the future.

I’m impressed these are already in vehicles since I heard the energy density wasn’t as good as lithium. Should do away with a lot of the stationary lithium stuff.