

So it’s just using CO2 like a refrigerant but to turn a turbine?
I mean, that’s cool and all, but some of the headlines make it sound like this is sequestration (not this one)


So it’s just using CO2 like a refrigerant but to turn a turbine?
I mean, that’s cool and all, but some of the headlines make it sound like this is sequestration (not this one)


Well put

It can’t slow down, or you get increasingly large bubbles
Like the AI bubble. The US economy has slowed down in nearly every other area, so everyone put the money into AI, the one growth area. Which made the bubble bigger, and more attractive for investment, and so on
Now when the AI bubble pops, it’s going to create bills no one can pay. And if we manage through that crisis, the next one will be larger. It’s the nature of a debt based economy
This ends in a jubilee, where the debts are forgiven, through hyperinflation, where the debts are shrunk into nothing, or the people in charge keep arguing about it until the starving peasants burst in

In fairness, the machine can not stop or go in reverse. It’ll tear itself apart violently
It also can’t go forward much further before it runs out of gas, so… We could prepare for that, but I think we’re just going to cover up the fuel gauge and hope for the best


Understandable, but it’s something to work towards. Talk to people you know about it, you’d be surprised how opportunities come out of the woodwork
It will take time, you can either go to networking events to try to speed it up or keep chugging away in a sustainable fashion in the meantime


Find a partner. It can be a person, it can be a small business that might be interested in selling your software… You need at least one partner
You could try to take out a business loan or keep grinding as a side hustle, but if you don’t know how to build a product (and I don’t mean architecture) you need someone who does
And I say it as someone who has come to that realization the hard way

OMG, what if we did the fake thing, but for real this time?


But honestly, it’s probably because I have ideasthesia. I feel ideas tactically
Bad code feels slimy, problem areas feel like sharp angles, good code feels clean and smooth, like a smooth river stone with clean even grooves that gracefully curve
Best advice I can give is to strive to write elegant code. I don’t strictly follow style guides or do docstrings… These are superficial. I try to match the style of the project, but my code is consistent even in projects that are not
Elegant code is pretty, regardless of formatting. You’ll know it when you see it, junior devs will follow the patterns without instruction. It does not require explanation, it does exactly what you think it does, and it makes complex problems simple


Yes, but only ship of thesius style
I’ve seen how people code, I’m writing my own stack on the way up


Nope, sorry. I just break my code into neatly grouped chunks, and I’m very consistent
I regularly go “I need something to do X”, and when I go to write it it’s already there. It does exactly what I need it to do, otherwise why would I name it X and not X_for_situation_y? I would never
My utility functions are reusable, my classes handle their own logic internally, and so my business logic is clean and readable. My code flows straight and clear, along a single path whenever possible
So yeah… When I start working with people, there’s the initial confusion then this moment where they go “Oh! That’s really easy to understand”


I get regularly complimented on my code for how understandable it is radiates smugness


It’s extremely important, because you’re never really picking a programming language, you’re picking a stack
You can technically write an android app in Python, but should you? You’re now locked into a framework used to run apps in Python, which are going to be much more limiting than other languages and frameworks. But you’ll also have access to Python libraries, which gives you options in that direction
Then you examine the context. How good are you at learning other languages? How long/complicated is what I want to do? Does this need to be performant? How long do I need to keep this working?
And most importantly, and you really have to think this one through… Will I need to extend the original goals in the future?
So really, yes, it’s very important. A bad decision in the beginning could cause problems for decades


You’re halfway there.
Yes, it was the best tool, in context
In that context, what was better?


Exactly. And what is the best tool? The best tool for the job


I meant to delete the comment to keep things simple, but what I was going to say is something like
fine, but debt is like gambling. There’s situations where it makes sense, but it’s addictive. It’s mortgaging your own future, even when it maths out it’s a risk - shit happens
And if you over leverage and under perform, it’s over. If you can pay yourself and your employees, you’re better off never taking on debt again.
Like Wegmans. It’s the very best grocery store, everyone who goes there agrees. They grow slowly because they only open new locations when they have the cash to do so, and so they never have to compromise on quality in any way


companies just can’t seem to know how to grow without line go up mentality.
That’s like saying “people just can’t seem to harness the advantages of cancer without dying”
If you never take money and get hooked by outside sources, you can just slowly grow, with no debt, beholden to no one
If you take the money with any strings attached at all, you basically have to grow like cancer or your company will be sold for parts. It’s inevitable at that point
Don’t take the money kids. If you have to take a business loan in the beginning - fine,


I don’t think you understand what doing code reviews is like.
So someone submits terrible code. You don’t get to just say “this is bad code” and reject it wholesale, you have to explain in exhaustive detail what the problems are. Doing otherwise leads to really toxic environments. It’s killed countless projects
That’s why you write rules. You don’t have to argue if they need tests or not, you tap the sign and reject it without actually reviewing it if it doesn’t meet the requirement
Same thing here. You open up vibe coded nonsense so you tap the sign and reject it without bothering to review it. Do the same thing with “bad code” as a reason and it starts insane drama.
People are really sensitive about their code, and there’s a whole methodology around how to do without ending up in a screaming match


Well I was just arguing that people generally are using AI irresponsibly, but if you want to get specific…
You say ban the users, but realistically how are they determining that? The only way to reliably check if something is AI is human intuition. There’s no tool to do that, it’s a real problem
So effectively, they made it an offense to submit AI slop. Because if you just use AI properly as a resource, no one would be able to tell
So what are you upset about?
They did basically what you suggested, they just did it by making a rule so that they can have a reason to reject slop without spending too much time justifying the rejection


People have already died to AI. It’s cute when the AI tells you to put glue on your pizza or asks you to leave your wife, it’s not so cute when architects and doctors use it
Bad information can be deadly. And if you rely too hard on AI, your cognitive abilities drop. It’s a simple mental shortcut that works on almost everything
It’s only been like 18 months, and already it’s become very apparent a lot of people can’t be trusted with it. Blame and punish those people all you want, it’ll just keep happening. Humans love their mental shortcuts
Realistically, I think we should just make it illegal to have customer facing LLMs as a service. You want an AI? Set it up yourself. It’s not hard, but realizing it’s just a file on your computer would do a lot to demystify it
I like baszite. I’m not in love with it, but it does most things I want it to do right out of the box, and it comes with steam installed which is convenient