• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “Our databases only store in RAM because I AM THE ELECTRICITY BATTERY MASTER”

    • Droechai@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You save quite a lot of time when working on a database if it’s stored in RAM compared to tape, so it does make sense to use that technology

          • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            My use case is primarily real time data capture - raw log is written to disk and can be recovered from, although at that point we’d have fallen back on the secondary as primary would now be suspect.

          • dion_starfire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            At which point you have to slurp down a few hundred terabytes from the other datacenters when the power turns back on.

            This is why Google datacenter managers hesitate to turn off the power even when an employee is in the process of getting electrocuted.

              • dion_starfire@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Sadly I cannot, since the source is an ex-Googler I know in person who was there personally. While I fully believe the story, I’m just some rando on the Internet, so you’re welcome to take it with the appropriate pile of salt.

                • optissima@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Thank you for the honesty, I do believe you fwiw, it’s in line with general business practices