Amethyst Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
iamroot@discuss.tchncs.de to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net · 3 months ago

Carbon capture more costly than switching to renewables, researchers find

techxplore.com

external-link
message-square
44
fedilink
195
external-link

Carbon capture more costly than switching to renewables, researchers find

techxplore.com

iamroot@discuss.tchncs.de to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net · 3 months ago
message-square
44
fedilink
For most countries around the world, sourcing energy entirely from wind, solar, geothermal, and hydropower by 2050 would reduce their energy needs and costs, improve air quality, and help slow climate change, according to a study in Environmental Science & Technology.
  • Nora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If any of you give a shit about the environment or animals, go vegan.

    Going vegan is the single biggest thing you can do to reduce your carbon footprint. apart from unaliving yourself.

    • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Going vegan is the single biggest thing you can do to reduce your carbon footprint

      how can you prove this?

      • Nora@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Here you go! https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/veganism-environmental-impact-planet-reduced-plant-based-diet-humans-study-a8378631.html

        • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s the opinion of one of the authors of the study. it is not a substantiated by the study itself.

          • Nora@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Its not just one. This is pretty common knowledge among people in their field. These are specialists in their field, their opinions don’t just come from nothing, they are informed by information from the studies.

            https://www.livekindly.com/scientists-say-going-vegan-help-save-planet/

            https://www.livekindly.com/eating-vegan-is-the-most-effective-way-to-combat-climate-change-says-largest-ever-food-production-analysis/

            • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              your first link doesn’t speak to your claim at all. your second link depends on the same author.

              • Nora@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Here’s a link to the research article itself with all the data from which they drew their conclusion: https://josephpoore.com/Science 360 6392 987 - Accepted Manuscript.pdf

                • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  they are misusing the LCA data. since it was gathered through disparate methodologies, it can’t be combined as they have done.

                  edit: regardless, this paper doesn’t support the claim you made.

                  • Nora@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    They aren’t, but I don’t feel like going into it with you. I will use a simpler data-point to prove that my initial claim was correct.

                    Livestock and their byproducts account for at least 32,000 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) per year, or 51% of all worldwide greenhouse gas emissions. If everyone went vegan, that would remove the majority of greenhouse gas production. So put simply, it would be the “biggest” thing everyone could do to reduce CO2 emissions.(That is just CO2, there are many other horrible things related to animal agriculture.)

                    Sources: Article: https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/study-claims-meat-creates-half-of-all-greenhouse-gases-1812909.html

                    The paper: https://www.fao.org/4/a0701e/a0701e00.htm

                  • Nora@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Here you go, this one does. and it’s peer-reviewed.

                    https://plantbasednews.org/news/environment/animal-ag-leading-cause-climate-change/

    • Beastimus@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Going vegan is a relatively small difference from going vegetarian, which is a small difference from just drastically cutting back on meat. The big thing is that our current systems are unsustainable for animal rights and the environment and everyone needs to cut back on meat drastically at the least. But I imagine that if you could stop driving a car entirely, that would be a bigger difference than losing a reasonable amount of meat from your diet. Though, cutting back on meat is an important step that all of us can take with much more ease.

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 614 users / day
  • 1.86K users / week
  • 3.86K users / month
  • 7.54K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 6.53K subscribers
  • 1.25K Posts
  • 4.03K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7@slrpnk.net
  • BE: 0.19.10
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org