Day 2: Red-Nosed Reports

Megathread guidelines

  • Keep top level comments as only solutions, if you want to say something other than a solution put it in a new post. (replies to comments can be whatever)
  • You can send code in code blocks by using three backticks, the code, and then three backticks or use something such as https://blocks.programming.dev/ if you prefer sending it through a URL

FAQ

  • Gobbel2000@programming.devEnglish
    0·
    3 months ago

    Rust

    The function is_sorted_by on Iterators turned out helpful for compactly finding if a report is safe. In part 2 I simply tried the same with each element removed, since all reports are very short.

    fn parse(input: String) -> Vec<Vec<i32>> {
    input.lines()
        .map(|l| l.split_whitespace().map(|w| w.parse().unwrap()).collect())
        .collect()
}

fn is_safe(report: impl DoubleEndedIterator<Item=i32> + Clone) -> bool {
    let safety = |a: &i32, b: &i32| (1..=3).contains(&(b - a));
    report.clone().is_sorted_by(safety) || report.rev().is_sorted_by(safety)
}

fn part1(input: String) {
    let reports = parse(input);
    let safe = reports.iter().filter(|r| is_safe(r.iter().copied())).count();
    println!("{safe}");
}

fn is_safe2(report: &[i32]) -> bool {
    (0..report.len()).any(|i| {  // Try with each element removed
        is_safe(report.iter().enumerate().filter(|(j, _)| *j != i).map(|(_, n)| *n))
    })
}

fn part2(input: String) {
    let reports = parse(input);
    let safe = reports.iter().filter(|r| is_safe2(r)).count();
    println!("{safe}");
}

util::aoc_main!();
    • Sleepless One@lemmy.mlEnglish
      01·
      3 months ago

      The is_sorted_by is a really nice approach. I originally tried using that function thinking that |a, b| a > b or |a, b| a < b would cut it but it didn’t end up working. I never thought to handle the check for the step being between 1 and 3 in the callback closure for that though.

  • Sleepless One@lemmy.mlEnglish
    01·
    3 months ago

    Rust

    use crate::utils::read_lines;

pub fn solution1() {
    let reports = get_reports();
    let safe_reports = reports
        .filter(|report| report.windows(3).all(window_is_valid))
        .count();

    println!("Number of safe reports = {safe_reports}");
}

pub fn solution2() {
    let reports = get_reports();
    let safe_reports = reports
        .filter(|report| {
            (0..report.len()).any(|i| {
                [&report[0..i], &report[i + 1..]]
                    .concat()
                    .windows(3)
                    .all(window_is_valid)
            })
        })
        .count();

    println!("Number of safe reports = {safe_reports}");
}

fn window_is_valid(window: &[usize]) -> bool {
    matches!(window[0].abs_diff(window[1]), 1..=3)
        && matches!(window[1].abs_diff(window[2]), 1..=3)
        && ((window[0] > window[1] && window[1] > window[2])
            || (window[0] < window[1] && window[1] < window[2]))
}

fn get_reports() -> impl Iterator<Item = Vec<usize>> {
    read_lines("src/day2/input.txt").map(|line| {
        line.split_ascii_whitespace()
            .map(|level| {
                level
                    .parse()
                    .expect("Reactor level is always valid integer")
            })
            .collect()
    })
}

    Definitely trickier than yesterday’s. I feel like the windows solution isn’t the best, but it was what came to mind and ended up working for me.