Washington – The Supreme Court has issued a ruling in a key case involving Fourth Amendment protections for the internet age. The Justices in Chatrie v.
I imagine its becasue the powers that be are confident they dont need a warrant to track you when youve agreed to everything in the privacy policy and given up your rights anyway sorta thing.
And if you didnt, your neighbor did. Or if yourneighbord didnt, then the local office/school/police department did for you.
I imagine its becasue the powers that be are confident they dont need a warrant to track you when youve agreed to everything in the privacy policy and given up your rights anyway sorta thing.
And if you didnt, your neighbor did. Or if yourneighbord didnt, then the local office/school/police department did for you.
Or like some sort of ‘we can just start offering general 4the amendment passes to cops’