weird@sub.wetshaving.social to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 17 days agoUse protectionNSFWsub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up1475arrow-down16
arrow-up1469arrow-down1imageUse protectionNSFWsub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 17 days agomessage-square23linkfedilink
minus-squareweird@sub.wetshaving.socialOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·17 days agoWhat’s the first one then?
minus-squareblackbeans@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up8·17 days agoAs the epoch is signed, the first date might refer to December 1901, at least for a 32-bit number.
minus-squareSystemDisc@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·16 days agoIf it’s seconds past the Epoch, the integer 1 would be January 1st, 1970 12:00:01 AM
minus-squareranzispa@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 days agoI guess which it should be date 1. With the date expressed in milliseconds that’d make it 999 milliseconds earlier than what you wrote. 12:00:01 would be the time at which the guy finally came.
What’s the first one then?
As the epoch is signed, the first date might refer to December 1901, at least for a 32-bit number.
If it’s seconds past the Epoch, the integer 1 would be January 1st, 1970 12:00:01 AM
I guess which it should be date 1. With the date expressed in milliseconds that’d make it 999 milliseconds earlier than what you wrote.
12:00:01 would be the time at which the guy finally came.
deleted by creator