cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agoIt will happen eventuallylemmy.mlimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1959arrow-down176
arrow-up1883arrow-down1imageIt will happen eventuallylemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square53fedilink
minus-squarewho@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down6·4 days agoNeither of those is a good approach, because part of every xkcd comic is the hover text.
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up40arrow-down1·4 days ago part of every xkcd comic is the hover text. Yes…that would be why you would link directly to the comic…?
minus-squarewho@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·4 days agoI was referring to the image-only link and the embed that you suggested. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·4 days agoOf course, with an embedded direct link, you could put the title text in as alt text: Unfortunately that won’t always show up in the same way title text does.
minus-squaretomenzgg@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoNot to mention circumvents the purpose of alt. text letting those unable to see to know what’s going on in the image.
Neither of those is a good approach, because part of every xkcd comic is the hover text.
Yes…that would be why you would link directly to the comic…?
I was referring to the image-only link and the embed that you suggested. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.
Of course, with an embedded direct link, you could put the title text in as alt text:
Unfortunately that won’t always show up in the same way title text does.
Not to mention circumvents the purpose of alt. text letting those unable to see to know what’s going on in the image.