Hi all, I have been chasing answers for this for months on the Proxmox forums, Reddit, and the LevelOneTechs forums and haven’t gotten much guidance, unfortunately. Hoping Lemmy will be the magic solution!
Perhaps I couched my initial thread in too much detail, so after some digging I got to more focused questions for my follow-up (effectively what this thread is), but I still didn’t get much of a response!
In all this time, I even have one more random thought I haven’t asked elsewhere - if I “Add Storage” of my ZFS pools in Proxmox, even though the categories don’t really fit data storage (the categories are like VM data, CT data, ISOs, snippets, etc.), then I could attach these to a VM or CT and replicate them via “normal” Proxmox cluster replication - is it OK to add such data pools to this storage section as such?
Anyway, to the main course - the summary of what I’m seeking help on is below.
Long story short:
- 3 nodes in a cluster, using ZFS.
- CTs and VMs are replicated across nodes via GUI.
- I want to replicate data in ZFS pools (which my CTs and VMs use - CTs through bind-mounts, VMs through NFS shares) to the other nodes.
- Currently using Sanoid/Syncoid to make this happen from one node to two others via cronjob.
So three questions:
- If I do Sanoid/Syncoid on all three nodes (to each other) - is this stupid, and will it fail - or will each node recognize snapshots for a ZFS pool and incrementally update if needed (even if the snapshot was made on/by a different node)?
- As a sub-question to this - and kind of the point of my overall thread and the previous one - is this even a sensible way to approach this, or is there a better way?
- For the GUI-based replication tasks, since I have CTs replicating to other systems, if I unchecked “skip replication” for the bind-mounted ZFS pools - would this accomplish the same thing? Or would it fail outright? I seem to remember needing to check this for some reason.
- Is this PVE-zsync suitable for my situation? I see mention of no recursive syncing, which I don’t fully know what that means, and I don’t know if that’s a dealbreaker. I suppose if this is the correct choice - then I need to delete my current GUI-based CT/VM replication tasks?
For those with immense patience, here was the original thread with more detail:
Hi all, so I setup three Proxmox servers (two identical, one “analogous”) - and the basics about the setup are as follows:
- VMs and CTs are replicated every 15 minutes from one node to the other two.
- One CT runs Cockpit for SMB shares - bind-mounted to the ZFS pools with the datasets that are SMB-shared.
- I use this for accessing folders via GUI over the network from my PC.
- One CT runs an NFS server (no special GUI, only CLI) - bind-mounted to the ZFS pools with the datasets that are NFS-shared (same as SMB-shared ones).
- Apps that need to tap into data use NFS shares (such as Jellyfin, Immich, Frigate) provided by this CT.
- Two VMs are of Debian, running Docker for my apps.
- VMs and CTs are all stored on 2x2TB M.2 NVMe SSDs.
- Data is stored in folders (per the NFS/SMB shares) on a 4x8TB ZFS pool with specific datasets like Media, Documents, etc. and a 1x4TB SSD ZFS “pool” for Frigate camera footage storage.
Due to having hardware passed-through to the VMs (GPU and Google Coral TPU) and using hardware resource mappings (one node as an Nvidia RTX A2000, two have Nvidia RTX 3050s - can have them all with the same mapped resource node ID to pass-through without issue despite being different GPUs), I don’t have instant HA failover.
Additionally, as I am using ZFS with data on all three separate nodes, I understand that I have a “gap” window in the event of HA where the data on one of the other nodes may not be all the way up-to-date if a failover occurs before a replication.
So after all the above - this brings me to my question - what is the best way to replicate data that is not a VM or a CT, but raw data stored on those ZFS pools for the SMB/NFS shares - from one node to another?
I have been using Sanoid/Syncoid installed on one node itself, with cronjobs. I’m sure I’m not using it perfectly (boy did I have a “fun” time with the config files), and I did have a headache with retention and getting rid of ZFS snapshots in a timely manner to not fill up the drives needlessly - but it seems to be working.
I just setup the third node (the “analogous” one in specs) which I want to be the active “primary” node and need to copy data over from the other current primary node - I just want to do it intelligently, and then have this node, in its new primary node role, take over the replication of data to the other two nodes.
Would so very, very badly appreciate guidance from those more informed/experienced than me on such topics.
Hmm, O.K., so you do that part I mentioned in italics? This section under Datacenter, to add those ZFS pools storing data? And then attach them to a VM via GUI?
If I’m understanding correctly, what “Content” selection do you choose for your data files in such pools?
What I think you’re getting at is to add an existing dataset from an existing pool there, then let PM rep it for you.
Here’s what I’d try. Add that pool as above, control-click both VM and container types in the dialog you get. Now go to your VM and add a new virtual drive, with a size that’s bigger than the dataset you want to add by whatever amount you think you will ever want for it. Stop the VM and on the host, edit the vm configuration file to point that new virtual drive at the storagename:dataset of the existing dataset you want to use. Start the VM and see what you get. Then I would expect that proxmox would be able to manage that dataset as if it were a regular one, assuming all the flags match. You will need to have a target store on your other nodes to match the name on the first node for replication to work.
Personally, I would replicate a new dataset from your old one to play with like this before I was certain it did what you want.
Frankly, the easier way to do all this is to copy the data into a regularly made virtual drive on the guest, but this might work fine, too.
Hmm, alright - yeah my other nodes have the same ZFS pools already made.
For adding a virtual drive, you mean going to this section, and choosing “Add: Hard Disk” then selecting whatever ZFS pool I would have added under the prior screenshot, under the highlighted red “Storage” box? Will the VM “see” the data already in that pool if it is attached to it like this?
Sorry for my ignorance - I’m a little confused by the “storagename:dataset” thing you mentioned?
And for another dumb question - when you say “copy the data into a regularly made virtual drive on the guest” - how is this different exactly?
One other thing comes to mind - instead of adding the ZFS pools to the VMs, what if I added them to my CT that runs an NFS server, via Mount Point (GUI) instead of the bind-mount way I currently have? Of course, I would need to add my existing ZFS pools to the Datacenter “Storage” section in the same way as previous discussed (with the weird content categories).
So if you go to /etc/pve/nodes/<nodename>/qemu-server on the PM host, you’ll find the config files for any VMs you made, which you can edit offline. In these files you’ll find all the devices etc you define in the GUI. If you fix the line for the new virtual drive to reflect the storagename:dataset of the existing dataset (from
zfs liston the host), it should attach that dataset via that drive when you boot the guest.Be sure to set the size to reflect at least the existing size of the data in the dataset so you don’t have issues when you bring that drive into the VM as a virtual drive that it’s not addressing the whole dataset because it thinks it ends sooner than it does. You’ll have to fstab that new virtual drive into your guest OS as usual.
As I said, I would highly suggest testing this by repping your dataset to a test dataset before importing it as above just to make sure it works as expected.
And I kinda thought you would be doing this to your NFS server, so just do that same thing but instead of /etc/pve/nodes/<nodename>/qemu-server you want /etc/pve/nodes/<nodename>/lxc for the CT config files. Once you mount the new virt drive in the CT, fix your NFS paths.
Ah, I see - this is effectively the same as the first image I shared, but via shell instead of GUI, right?
For my NFS server CT, my config file is as follows currently, with bind-mounts:
arch: amd64 cores: 2 hostname: bridge memory: 512 mp0: /spynet/NVR,mp=/mnt/NVR,replicate=0,shared=1 mp1: /holocron/Documents,mp=/mnt/Documents,replicate=0,shared=1 mp2: /holocron/Media,mp=/mnt/Media,replicate=0,shared=1 mp3: /holocron/Syncthing,mp=/mnt/Syncthing,replicate=0,shared=1 net0: name=eth0,bridge=vmbr0,firewall=1,gw=192.168.0.1,hwaddr=BC:24:11:62:C2:13,ip=192.168.0.82/24,type=veth onboot: 1 ostype: debian rootfs: ctdata:subvol-101-disk-0,size=8G startup: order=2 swap: 512 lxc.apparmor.profile: unconfined lxc.cgroup2.devices.allow: a lxc.cap.drop:For full context, my list of ZFS pools (yes, I’m a Star Wars nerd):
So you’re saying to list the relevant four ZFS datasets in there but, instead of as bind-points, as virtual drives (as seen in the “rootfs” line)? Or rather, as “storage backed mount points” from here:
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Linux_Container#_storage_backed_mount_points
Hopefully I’m on the right track!
Add a fresh disk from one of your ZFS backed storages instead of a mountpoint from a directory. When I do that I get a mount like:
mp0: local-zfs:subvol-105-disk-1,mp=/mountpoint,replicate=0,size=8GCan cat me /etc/pve/storage.cfg so I can see where your mp’s are coming from? I’d expect to see them show up as storagename:dataset like mine unless you’re mounting them as directory type.
So currently I haven’t re-added any of the data-storing ZFS pools to the Datacenter storage section (wanted to understand what I’m doing before trying anything). Right now my storage.cfg reads as follows (without having added anything):
zfspool: virtualizing pool virtualizing content images,rootdir mountpoint /virtualizing nodes chimaera,executor,lusankya sparse 0 zfspool: ctdata pool virtualizing/ctdata content rootdir mountpoint /virtualizing/ctdata sparse 0 zfspool: vmdata pool virtualizing/vmdata content images mountpoint /virtualizing/vmdata sparse 0 dir: ISOs path /virtualizing/ISOs content iso prune-backups keep-all=1 shared 0 dir: templates path /virtualizing/templates content vztmpl prune-backups keep-all=1 shared 0 dir: backup path /virtualizing/backup content backup prune-backups keep-all=1 shared 0 dir: local path /var/lib/vz content snippets prune-backups keep-all=1 shared 0Under my ZFS pools (same on each node), I have the following:
The “holocron” pool is a RAIDZ1 combo of 4x8TB HDDs, “virtualizing” is RAID mirrored 2x2TB SSDs, and “spynet” is a single 4TB SSD (NVR storage).
When you say to “add a fresh disk” - you just mean to add a resource to a CT/VM, right? I trip on the terminology at times, haha. And would it be wise to add the root ZFS pool (such as “holocron”) or to add specific datasets under it (such as "Media or “Documents”)?
I’m intending to create a test dataset under “holocron” to test this all out before I put my real data through any risk, of course.