• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Those were obviously rhetorical question marks.

    The information you’re pretending to be interested in is readily available in the article above and elsewhere.

    • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      From OC:

      Those things, from what I heard, are an absolute necessity of an upgrade for postal workers.

      emphasis mine.

      You’re acting like it is obvious what they heard, and I shouldn’t ask for details of what looks like first hand reports of usage of the new vehicles.

      So go fuck yourselves and the high horses you rode in on.

      • Lvdwsn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Just FYI a comment isn’t an article, you gotta click on the link at the top of the page and read the article, which is what he’s suggesting you read. That’s where you can find the details.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          I cannot make it any clearer: I am interested in @AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 's account. He said he heard opinions about the new cars, I suppose it’s from drivers. I’d love to hear more. From AceFuzzLord. Or did they write the article?

          • Lvdwsn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            He read it in the article that was posted is what we’re all saying. Why don’t you read it? That’s what his comment was referring to, because he commented on the article. Hope this helps!